Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258453›Full record

ArticleBirth defects research2024

Survival of Children With Critical Congenital Heart Defects in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study.

Nina E Forestieri, Andrew F Olshan, Matthew E Oster, Elizabeth C Ailes, Michael P Fundora, Sarah C Fisher, Charles Shumate, Paul A Romitti, Rebecca F Liberman, Wendy N Nembhard and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth defects research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The impact of PMScientific reports · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nina E ForestieriBirth Defects Monitoring Program, State Center for Health Statistics, Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7894-0279
Andrew F OlshanDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9115-5128
Matthew E OsterDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta; and School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Elizabeth C AilesDivision of Birth Defects and Infant Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2062-8148
Michael P FundoraDivision of Pediatric Cardiology, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta; and School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Sarah C FisherBirth Defects Registry, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4702-1007
Charles ShumateBirth Defects Epidemiology and Surveillance Branch, Texas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2884-2835
Paul A RomittiDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5393-9984
Rebecca F LibermanMassachussets Center for Birth Defects Research and Prevention, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-4145
Wendy N NembhardDepartment of Epidemiology, College of Public Health; and Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8318-4049
Suzan L CarmichaelDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Tania A DesrosiersDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Funding

Viral VectorP30CA086862 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Christopher K Laubenthal · 2000 to 2026
$70.0M
New York State Component A: BD-STEPS II CoreU01DD001227 · DD · CENTER OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH · PI HOWLEY, MEREDITH M · 2018 to 2022
$4.2M
North Carolina Birth Defects Study To Evaluate Pregnancy Exposures (NC BD-STEPS)U01DD001036 · DD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI OLSHAN, ANDREW · 2013 to 2017
$3.5M
New York State BD-STEPS: Component A and BU01DD001304 · DD · NYSDOH/HEALTH RESEARCH, INC. · PI HOWLEY, MEREDITH M · 2023 to 2025
$2.6M
CDC HHSIntramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001036NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001227NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCritical congenital heart defects (CCHDs) are associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. This study estimated survival of children with nonsyndromic CCHDs and evaluated relationships between exposures of interest and survival by CCHD severity (univentricular or biventricular function).

methodsThis analysis included 4380 infants with CCHDs (cases) born during 1999-2011 and enrolled in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, a multisite, population-based case-control study of major birth defects. Cases were linked to state death files. Nonparametric Kaplan-Meier survival functions were used to estimate 1- and 5-year survival probabilities overall and by severity group (univentricular/biventricular) stratified by demographic and clinical exposure variables of interest. The log-rank test was used to determine whether stratified survival curves were equivalent. Survival and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were also estimated using Cox proportional hazards modeling adjusted for maternal age, education, race/ethnicity, study site, and birth year.

resultsOne- and five-year survival rates were 85.8% (CI 84.7-86.8) and 83.7% (CI 82.5-84.9), respectively. Univentricular 5-year survival was lower than biventricular case survival [65.3% (CI 61.7-68.5) vs. 89.0% (CI 87.8-90.1; p < 0.001)]. Clinical factors (e.g. preterm birth, low birthweight, and complex/multiple defects) were associated with lower survival in each severity group. Sociodemographic factors (non-Hispanic Black race/ethnicity, <high school education, smoking, and lower household income) were only associated with survival among biventricular cases.

conclusionsMortality among children with CCHDs occurred primarily in the first year of life. Survival was lower for those with univentricular defects, and social determinants of health were most important in predicting survival for those with biventricular defects.

Indexed as

Heart Defects, CongenitalCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleProportional Hazards ModelsRisk FactorsSurvival RateUnited StatesCCHD severitycritical congenital heart defectsearly childhood mortalityNational Birth Defects Prevention Studysurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID39258453
PMCPMC11548799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.