Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258298›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Residual swin transformer for classifying the types of cotton pests in complex background.

Ting Zhang, Jikui Zhu, Fengkui Zhang, Shijie Zhao, Wei Liu, Ruohong He, Hongqiang Dong, Qingqing Hong, Changwei Tan, Ping Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ting ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Jikui ZhuCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Fengkui ZhangCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Shijie ZhaoCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Wei LiuJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of the Ministry of Education of China/Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Knowledge Management and Intelligent Service, College of Information Engineer, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Ruohong HeCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Hongqiang DongCorps in Southern Xinjiang, College of Agronomy, Tarim University, Alar, China.
Qingqing HongJiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops/Joint International Research Laboratory of Agriculture and Agri-Product Safety of the Ministry of Education of China/Jiangsu Province Engineering Research Center of Knowledge Management and Intelligent Service, College of Information Engineer, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Changwei TanJiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology/Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Cultivation and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Ping LiCollege of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering/Modern Agricultural Engineering Key Laboratory at Universities of Education Department of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region/Key Laboratory of Tarim Oasis Agriculture (Tarim University) Ministry of Education, Tarim University, Alar, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cotton pests have a major impact on cotton quality and yield during cotton production and cultivation. With the rapid development of agricultural intelligence, the accurate classification of cotton pests is a key factor in realizing the precise application of medicines by utilize unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), large application devices and other equipment. Methods: In this study, a cotton insect pest classification model based on improved Swin Transformer is proposed. The model introduces the residual module, skip connection, into Swin Transformer to improve the problem that pest features are easily confused in complex backgrounds leading to poor classification accuracy, and to enhance the recognition of cotton pests. In this study, 2705 leaf images of cotton insect pests (including three insect pests, cotton aphids, cotton mirids and cotton leaf mites) were collected in the field, and after image preprocessing and data augmentation operations, model training was performed. Results: The test results proved that the accuracy of the improved model compared to the original model increased from 94.6% to 97.4%, and the prediction time for a single image was 0.00434s. The improved Swin Transformer model was compared with seven kinds of classification models (VGG11, VGG11-bn, Resnet18, MobilenetV2, VIT, Swin Transformer small, and Swin Transformer base), and the model accuracy was increased respectively by 0.5%, 4.7%, 2.2%, 2.5%, 6.3%, 7.9%, 8.0%. Discussion: Therefore, this study demonstrates that the improved Swin Transformer model significantly improves the accuracy and efficiency of cotton pest detection compared with other classification models, and can be deployed on edge devices such as utilize unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), thus providing an important technological support and theoretical basis for cotton pest control and precision drug application.

Indexed as

complex backgroundcotton pestsdeep learningswin transformerunmanned aerial vehicles

Identifiers

PMID39258298
PMCPMC11383767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.