Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258296›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2024

Effects of

Everlon Cid Rigobelo, Luana Alves de Andrade, Carlos Henrique Barbosa Santos, Edvan Teciano Frezarin, Luziane Ramos Sales, Lucas Amoroso Lopes de Carvalho, Daniel Guariz Pinheiro, Daniel Nicodemo, Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, Maria Caroline Quecine Verdi and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  3. Interaction BetweenToxins · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Everlon Cid RigobeloAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luana Alves de AndradeAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Barbosa SantosAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Edvan Teciano FrezarinAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luziane Ramos SalesAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Lucas Amoroso Lopes de CarvalhoAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Guariz PinheiroAgricultural and Livestock Microbiology Postgraduate Program, São Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel NicodemoFaculty of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences, State University of São Paulo (UNESP), Jaboticabal, Brazil.
Olubukola Oluranti BabalolaFood Security and Safety Focus Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, North-West University, Mmabatho, South Africa.
Maria Caroline Quecine VerdiUniversity of São Paulo, College of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz", Genetics Science Department, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Mateus MondinUniversity of São Paulo, College of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz", Genetics Science Department, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Nicolas DesoigniesUniversity of São Paulo, College of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz", Genetics Science Department, Piracicaba, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Soybean is a significant export product for several countries, including the United States and Brazil. There are numerous varieties of soybean. Among them, a genetically modified type known as INTACTA RR2 PRO™ has been designed to demonstrate resistance to glyphosate and to produce toxins that are lethal to several species of caterpillars. Limited information is available on the use of Methods: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of these microorganisms on this soybean cultivar by analyzing parameters, such as root and shoot dry matter, nutritional status, and root and soil microbial diversity. Results: The results indicated that treatments with Discussion: The combined application of

Indexed as

Bacillus subtilismicrobiomeplant growth-promotionplant microbiologysoil microbiology

Identifiers

PMID39258296
PMCPMC11383790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.