ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Hump Rasping Using Powered Instruments: A Retrospective Review.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07142525 (Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes Following Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Traditional Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Aesthetic and Functional Outcomes Following Hybrid Osteoplasty Versus Traditional Osteotomy in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Use of Conical Powered Burrs in Surgery of the Bony Nasal Pyramid.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nasal hump reduction, a common procedure in rhinoplasty, aims to create a harmonious nasal appearance with smooth dorsal lines. An alternative to traditional osteotomes is the carbide-tip nasal rasp, effective in eliminating modest contour deformities. However, the broad movements and physical forces of manual rasping can significantly weaken the osseocartilaginous vault. Power-assisted instruments have been used to reduce soft tissue trauma. Although long-term clinical outcomes of power-assisted instrumentation are pending, initial reports have been positive. Methods: This retrospective chart review encompassed 220 consecutive rhinoplasty cases conducted by the senior author, all involving women aged 19-37 years. Excluding 80 cases that did not involve bone reduction, the analysis concentrated on 140 patients who underwent bone reduction procedures. The success of nasal hump reduction was evaluated based on the joint satisfaction of both the patient and the surgeon with the surgical improvement. Results: The open rhinoplasty approach was predominantly used for surgical exposure to minimize inadvertent rasping of the nasal cartilage. Among the 140 patients undergoing power-assisted bone removal, all but five achieved an initially satisfactory refinement of the bony nasal contour. Notably, no serious complications were observed throughout the study. Unfortunately, one patient did not comply with the monthly steroid injections, leading to the necessity of revision surgery for the removal of regenerated bone. Conclusion: The integration of power-assisted instrumentation in rhinoplasty procedures represents a promising advancement, addressing challenges associated with traditional methods.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.