Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258273›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2024

Ciprofol in Children Undergoing Adenoidectomy and Adenotonsillectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chao Zeng, Lu Li, Mengrui Wang, Jun Xiong, Wenjuan Pang, Haiyan Yu, Jiadi He, Xuguang Wang, Yingying Chen, Yanyan Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Chao Zeng *Department of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Lu Li *Department of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Mengrui Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Jun XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9083-4751
Wenjuan PangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Haiyan YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Jiadi HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Xuguang WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yingying ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.
Yanyan SunDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-6735-5725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Ciprofol is a novel anesthetic agent, its efficacy and safety had been verified and its clinical implementation has been expanded. However, the knowledge about ciprofol in children is meager. The aim of study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ciprofol in general anesthesia in children undergoing adenoidectomy and adenotonsillectomy, compared with propofol. Materials: We retrospectively analyzed data of children who underwent adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy with general anesthesia from June to August 2023 to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ciprofol. The primary outcomes included hemodynamic changes during induction and postoperative complications in post-anesthesia care unit. The secondary outcomes were extubation time, pediatric anesthesia emergence delirium (PAED) score. Meanwhile, subgroup analysis was performed based on age. Results: 301 children met the inclusion criteria, 157 received ciprofol induction and 144 received propofol. Patient demographics and operation-related information were similar in the two groups. However, the dosage of dexmedetomidine in the propofol group was significantly higher than that of the ciprofol group ( Conclusion: Ciprofol exhibited advantageous characteristics in the induction of children, such as stable hemodynamics, a relatively lower incidence of postoperative delirium without apparent post-anesthesia complications. Ciprofol may emerge as a novel option for general anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Indexed as

AdenoidectomyAnesthesia, GeneralTonsillectomyChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleHumansInfantMalePostoperative ComplicationsPropofolRetrospective StudiesPropofoladenoidectomychildciprofoldeliriumgeneral anesthesiapropofol

Identifiers

PMID39258273
PMCPMC11385364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.