Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258238›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2024

Towards accurate and efficient diagnoses in nephropathology: An AI-based approach for assessing kidney transplant rejection.

Alexey Fayzullin, Elena Ivanova, Victor Grinin, Dmitry Ermilov, Svetlana Solovyeva, Maxim Balyasin, Alesia Bakulina, Pavel Nikitin, Yana Valieva, Alina Kalinichenko and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Alexey FayzullinInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Elena IvanovaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Victor GrininPJSC VimpelCom, 10 8th March Street, Moscow 127083, Russia.
Dmitry ErmilovPJSC VimpelCom, 10 8th March Street, Moscow 127083, Russia.
Svetlana SolovyevaB.V.Petrovsky Russian Research Center of Surgery, 2 Abrikosovskiy lane, Moscow 119991, Russia.
Maxim BalyasinScientific and Educational Resource Center, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia, 6 Miklukho-Maklaya st., Moscow 117198, Russia.
Alesia BakulinaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Pavel NikitinInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Yana ValievaInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Alina KalinichenkoInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Alexander ArutyunyanPJSC VimpelCom, 10 8th March Street, Moscow 127083, Russia.
Aleksey LychaginDepartment of Trauma, Orthopedics and Disaster Surgery, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Peter TimashevInstitute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8-2 Trubetskaya st., Moscow 119991, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Banff classification is useful for diagnosing renal transplant rejection. However, it has limitations due to subjectivity and varying concordance in physicians' assessments. Artificial intelligence (AI) can help standardize research, increase objectivity and accurately quantify morphological characteristics, improving reproducibility in clinical practice. This study aims to develop an AI-based solutions for diagnosing acute kidney transplant rejection by introducing automated evaluation of prognostic morphological patterns. The proposed approach aims to help accurately distinguish borderline changes from rejection. We trained a deep-learning model utilizing a fine-tuned Mask R-CNN architecture which achieved a mean Average Precision value of 0.74 for the segmentation of renal tissue structures. A strong positive nonlinear correlation was found between the measured infiltration areas and fibrosis, indicating the model's potential for assessing these parameters in kidney biopsies. The ROC analysis showed a high predictive ability for distinguishing between ci and i scores based on infiltration area and fibrosis area measurements. The AI model demonstrated high precision in predicting clinical scores which makes it a promising AI assisting tool for pathologists. The application of AI in nephropathology has a potential for advancements, including automated morphometric evaluation, 3D histological models and faster processing to enhance diagnostic accuracy and efficiency.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceComputational pathologyDigital pathologyTransplant rejectionWhole slide images

Identifiers

PMID39258238
PMCPMC11385065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.