ArticleDementia & neuropsychologia2024
Five Digit Test in neuropsychological assessment of working memory in aged individuals:normative data.
Article in Dementia & neuropsychologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Five Digit Test (FDT) is an executive function assessment tool designed to be used across the lifespan, from children to the aged. Objective: To provide validity evidence for FDT in the neuropsychological assessment of working memory in the aged. Methods: A total of 100 subjects, aged between 56 and 86 years, representing both genders with varying levels of education, underwent a comprehensive clinical history and neuropsychological evaluation using FDT. The mean age of participants was 71.04 years, with 67.3% having intermediate education. Participants were categorized into two groups: Control Group and Cognitive Decline Group. To establish validity evidence, FDT scores (both time and errors) were correlated with the WAIS-III Digits scale. Spearman's correlation coefficient and ROC curve methodology were employed to determine psychometric properties. Results: A significant and moderate negative correlation was evident between FDT Shifting (number of errors) and Digits score (rho=-0.51; p<0.0001), Direct Order (rho=-0.39; p<0.0001), and Indirect Order (rho=-0.46; p<0.0001). The area under the curve was higher for FDT Shifting (errors) (AUC=0.935) for a cutoff point greater than or equal to 5 points, compared to Digits (AUC=0.748). Conclusion: The assessment of the number of errors in FDT Shifting appears to be a statistically significant tool for evaluating working memory impairment in the aged.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.