ArticleBiology methods & protocols2024
Advanced image generation for cancer using diffusion models.
Article in Biology methods & protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Systematic Review on Synthetic Medical Images Generation-Recent Trends and Future Opportunities.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The context of new media art for photography generation based on diffusion models.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- High-Fidelity Synthesis of Temporomandibular Joint Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images via Latent Diffusion Models.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Review
- Coherent cross-modal generation of synthetic biomedical data to advance multimodal precision medicine.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Diffusion Models in Oncology: a Review of Current Applications.Current oncology reports · 2026Review
- Radiomics applications in the modern management of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep neural networks have significantly advanced the field of medical image analysis, yet their full potential is often limited by relatively small dataset sizes. Generative modeling, particularly through diffusion models, has unlocked remarkable capabilities in synthesizing photorealistic images, thereby broadening the scope of their application in medical imaging. This study specifically investigates the use of diffusion models to generate high-quality brain MRI scans, including those depicting low-grade gliomas, as well as contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and chest and lung X-ray images. By leveraging the DreamBooth platform, we have successfully trained stable diffusion models utilizing text prompts alongside class and instance images to generate diverse medical images. This approach not only preserves patient anonymity but also substantially mitigates the risk of patient re-identification during data exchange for research purposes. To evaluate the quality of our synthesized images, we used the Fréchet inception distance metric, demonstrating high fidelity between the synthesized and real images. Our application of diffusion models effectively captures oncology-specific attributes across different imaging modalities, establishing a robust framework that integrates artificial intelligence in the generation of oncological medical imagery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.