Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258140›Full record

ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2024

Impact of Dosimetric Compromises on Early Outcomes of Chordomas and Chondrosarcomas Treated With Image-guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy.

Srinivas Chilukuri, Nagarjuna Burela, Sham Sundar, Ramakrishna Kamath, Sapna Nangia, Manikandan Arjunan, Roopesh Kumar, Vishnu Ramanujam, Ari Chacko, Dayananda Shamurailatpam Sharma and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Advances in Radiation Therapy for Primary Bone Malignancies.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Srinivas ChilukuriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nagarjuna BurelaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sham SundarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ramakrishna KamathDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Sapna NangiaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manikandan ArjunanDepartment of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Roopesh KumarDepartment of Neurosurgery, MGM Healthcare, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Vishnu RamanujamDepartment of Orthopedic Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ari ChackoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Dayananda Shamurailatpam SharmaDepartment of Medical Physics, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rakesh JalaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To critically review the clinical factors, dosimetry, and their correlation with early outcomes in patients with chordomas and chondrosarcomas treated with pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton beam therapy (PBT). Methods and Materials: Consecutive 64 patients diagnosed with chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated at our center were studied. Patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors including dosimetry were captured. Early and late toxicities and early outcomes were evaluated and correlated with clinical and dosimetric factors using standard statistical tools. Results: The median age of patients was 39 years (range, 4-74 years), and most common site was skull base (47%), followed by sacrum (31%) and mobile spine (22%). The median prescription dose to the high-risk clinical target volumes for chordoma and chondrosarcoma was 70.4 cobalt gray equivalent (CGE) and 66 CGE at 2.2 CGE per fraction, respectively. At presentation, 55% presented after a recurrence/progression of which 17% had received previous radiation and 32% had a significant neural compression. At the time of PBT, 25% of patients had suboptimal neural separation. Three-fourths of patients had at least an acceptable target coverage. Although 11% had a tier 1 compromise (gross tumor volume [GTV] D98 < 90%), 14% had a tier 2 compromise (GTVD98 < 59 CGE). With a median follow-up of 27.5 months, 2-year local control and progression-free survival was 86.7% and 81.8% for chordomas and 87.5% and 77.1% for chondrosarcomas, respectively. Residual GTV of >25 cm Conclusions: Despite multiple surgeries, adequate neural separation was challenging to achieve. Severe dosimetric compromise (GTV D98 < 59 CGE) led to inferior early outcomes. Adequate neural separation is key to avoiding dosimetric compromise and achieving optimal local control.

Identifiers

PMID39258140
PMCPMC11381865

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.