ReviewCureus2024
Machine Learning and Vision: Advancing the Frontiers of Diabetic Cataract Management.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cha-PO and CVNet: a hybrid approach for automated cataract detection using adaptive feature selection and deep learning for high accuracy and efficiency.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- T1D-Related Cataract Risk Amplification: Mendelian Randomisation Confirms a Dual Hit of Immune-Inflammatory Burden and Metabolic Stress.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Article
- Detection and diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus images using agentic AI approaches.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Diabetes and Cataracts Development-Characteristics, Subtypes and Predictive Modeling Using Machine Learning in Romanian Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This comprehensive review explores the integration of machine learning (ML) in managing diabetic cataracts. It discusses the potential application of ML to identify novel methodologies for early detection, diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions. The review also addresses clinical translation challenges, including pharmacokinetics properties and ethical considerations. The approach toward cataractogenesis, therefore, has to be from a holistic viewpoint, bringing oxidative stress and metabolic disturbances to the top of importance. It outlines the important requirements, including continued research, diversified datasets, and uses interdisciplinary collaborations in making improvements in ML models and thereafter bridging the gap between computational promise and clinical implication, with the aim to help in the maximization of patient care in the management of diabetic cataract. A literature search through databases like PubMed and Scopus focusing on understanding of current innovations, challenges, and future directions in employing ML in diabetic cataract management was undertaken. This review has explored both recent and foundational studies in order to explain the development and gaps of current research with an aim to enhance outcomes of patient care by promoting future investigation. Key findings revealed a wide application of ML in ophthalmology including treatment identification, cataract detection and grading, and improving the surgical outcomes. However, this is accompanied by some obstacles, including risk of bias, concerns regarding artificial intelligence application as a diagnostic tool, and legal regulations. ML promises extraordinary developments in the treatment of diabetic cataracts through betterment in diagnosis, treatment, and patient care. With this, it is full of clinical translation and ethical challenges, yet there is recognition in general that continuous model refinement and interdisciplinary collaboration, along with the expansion of the two identified key elements in enhancing patient outcomes, are essential for this to continue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.