ArticleCureus2024
Trends in the Assessment of Social Frailty in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and potential influencing factors of social frailty among community-dwelling older adults in China: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC geriatrics · 2026Pooled it
- When minds and networks matter: how mental health and social capital shape social frailty in older adults.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessment of social frailty is crucial; however, definitions and assessment methods lack standardization. This review examined social frailty in community-dwelling older adults, highlighted trends in the definitions and assessment items used to date, and identified issues in assessing social frailty. The PubMed and CINAHL databases were searched for articles related to social frailty published up to 2022, and 95 articles were included in this review. The Bunt classification was used to assess the trends in items considered indicative of social frailty. Existing rating scales for social frailty were used in 82% of studies, and cut-off values were defined in 62% of studies. Factors such as the level of education; social interaction (weekly outings); and feelings of abandonment, emptiness, and lack of social integration (absence of a partner and non-participation in social organizations or activities) were evaluated less frequently. This study revealed that subjective feelings, including the fulfillment of social needs and participation in social activities, are less commonly considered in the assessment of social frailty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.