ArticleEuropean heart journal. Case reports2024
Accelerated hypertension following mavacamten introduction in severe obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with hypertension: a case report.
Article in European heart journal. Case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coexistence of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Arterial Hypertension: Current Insights and Future Directions.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Early Detection of Treatment Response to Mavacamten in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy With Severe Mitral Regurgitation Using Magnetocardiography.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Case Report: Transient hypertension and myalgia following mavacamten therapy in a patient with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Cardiac Myosin Inhibitors in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Clinical Advances and Therapeutic Prospects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mavacamten in Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials was well tolerated, reduced left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO), and improved exercise capacity and symptoms. However, due to its recent introduction in the market, there is limited evidence from real-world patients with severe/multiple comorbidities and/or who are exposed to potential treatment interactions. Hypertension is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but its impact on the treatment of LVOTO is undefined. Case summary: A 55-year-old man with severely obstructive symptomatic HCM and Grade I arterial hypertension underwent treatment with mavacamten 5 mg. He presented an accelerated hypertension from Day 10 of treatment. On admission, he reported improvement of his dyspnoea [New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II] and NT-pro BNP decreased to 1646 ng/L. Echocardiography showed a left ventricular ejection fraction of 60% with reduced systolic anterior motion and LVOTO (max 21 mmHg). Causes of secondary hypertension were excluded, and blood pressure (BP) was controlled by eplerenone and amlodipine introduction. Accelerated hypertension was concluded as a final diagnosis, and a potential causal link with the introduction of mavacamten was made. Evolution up to Day 135 proved a stabilization of the BP profile and of the LVOT gradient (max 36 mmHg) as well as improvement in functional capacity (NYHA Class I). Discussion: We hypothesize that rapid relief of excess afterload may induce alterations potentially leading to high BP in patients with impaired peripheral vascular resistances. Patients with severe obstructive HCM and hypertension should be given special attention during mavacamten titration and should self-monitor the BP during this phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.