Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39258007›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2024

Gene editing of angiotensin for blood pressure management.

Stefano Masi, Hermann Dalpiaz, Claudio Borghi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefano MasiDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Hermann DalpiazDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Italy.
Claudio BorghiHypertension and Cardiovascular Disease Research Center, Medical and Surgical Sciences Department, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40126, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arterial hypertension has remained the world's leading cause of morbidity and mortality for more than 20 years. While early Genome-Wide Association Studies raised the hypothesis that a precision medicine approach could be implemented in the treatment of hypertension, the large number of single nucleotide polymorphisms that were found to be associated with blood pressure and their limited impact on the blood pressure values have initially hampered these expectations. With the development and refinement of gene-editing and RNA-based approaches allowing selective and organ-specific modulation of critical systems involved in blood pressure regulation, a renewed interest in genetic treatments for hypertension has emerged. The CRISPR-Cas9 system, antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) and small interfering RNA (siRNA) have been used to specifically target the hepatic angiotensinogen (AGT) production, with the scope of safely but effectively reducing the activation of the renin-angiotensin system, ultimately leading to an effective reduction of the blood pressure with extremely simplified treatment regimens that involve weekly, monthly or even once-in-life injection of the drugs. Among the various approaches, siRNA and ASO that reduce hepatic AGT production are in advanced development, with phase I and II clinical trials showing their safety and effectiveness. In the current manuscript, we review the mode of action of these new approaches to hypertension treatment, discussing the results of the clinical trials and their potential to revolutionize the management of hypertension.

Identifiers

PMID39258007
PMCPMC11382036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.