ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2024
Preoperative Patient Guidance and Education in Aesthetic Breast Plastic Surgery: A Novel Proposed Application of Artificial Intelligence Large Language Models.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Psychological Risk Assessment in Plastic Surgery via a DeepSeek Large Language Model: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- An Evaluation of Breast Augmentation: Accuracy, Utility, and Accessibility of Knowledge for Patient Education and Consultation with Artificial Intelligence.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Beyond Search Engine Optimization: How Large Language Models Are Redefining Surgeon Visibility.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Non-Surgical Cosmetic Procedures: A Multi-Stakeholder Revolution.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review of Pre-, Intra-, and Postoperative Applications.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
- The Rise of Intelligent Plastic Surgery: A 10-Year Bibliometric Journey Through AI Applications, Challenges, and Transformative Potential.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluating Surgical Results in Breast Cancer with Artificial Intelligence.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Comparison of Multiple State-of-the-Art Large Language Models for Patient Education Prior to CT and MRI Examinations.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Article
- The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Surgical Decision-Making: An Updated and Comprehensive Overview of Precision and Personalization in Current Evidence.Cancer management and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: At a time when Internet and social media use is omnipresent among patients in their self-directed research about their medical or surgical needs, artificial intelligence (AI) large language models (LLMs) are on track to represent hallmark resources in this context. Objectives: The authors aim to explore and assess the performance of a novel AI LLM in answering questions posed by simulated patients interested in aesthetic breast plastic surgery procedures. Methods: A publicly available AI LLM was queried using simulated interactions from the perspective of patients interested in breast augmentation, mastopexy, and breast reduction. Questions posed were standardized and categorized under aesthetic needs inquiries and awareness of appropriate procedures; patient candidacy and indications; procedure safety and risks; procedure information, steps, and techniques; patient assessment; preparation for surgery; postprocedure instructions and recovery; and procedure cost and surgeon recommendations. Using standardized Likert scales ranging from 1 to 10, 4 expert breast plastic surgeons evaluated responses provided by AI. A postparticipation survey assessed expert evaluators' experience with LLM technology, perceived utility, and limitations. Results: The overall performance across all question categories, assessment criteria, and procedures examined was 7.3/10 ± 0.5. Overall accuracy of information shared was scored at 7.1/10 ± 0.5; comprehensiveness at 7.0/10 ± 0.6; objectivity at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; safety at 7.5/10 ± 0.4; communication clarity at 7.3/10 ± 0.2; and acknowledgment of limitations at 7.7/10 ± 0.2. With regards to performance on procedures examined, the model's overall score was 7.0/10 ± 0.8 for breast augmentation; 7.6/10 ± 0.5 for mastopexy; and 7.4/10 ± 0.5 for breast reduction. The score on breast implant-specific knowledge was 6.7/10 ± 0.6. Conclusions: Albeit not without limitations, AI LLMs represent promising resources for patient guidance and patient education. The technology's machine learning capabilities may explain its improved performance efficiency. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.