ArticleMedicine international
Exploring perinatal care and birth experiences in women with visual impairment: A retrospective study.
Article in Medicine international. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Breastfeeding Experiences of Mothers With Visual Impairment: A Scoping Review.Maternal & child nutrition · 2025Article
- Learning from the Implementation of Disability-Inclusive Maternity Care: A Scoping Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, ~2.2 billion individuals suffer from visual impairment, with a large proportion of these individuals being women of reproductive age. This demographic often faces unique healthcare challenges, particularly during pregnancy, childbirth and the puerperium. However, despite the significant prevalence of visual impairment among women, there are only a limited number of studies available addressing their specific perinatal care needs. The present study aimed to fill this gap by exploring the perinatal experiences of women who are visually impaired, highlighting the existing care provisions and identifying areas for improvement. For this purpose, a retrospective study was conducted from January to June, 2021, involving 22 women with visual impairment who gave birth after 2005. The study participants were recruited through several organizations supporting individuals who are visually impaired and the participants completed a comprehensive electronic questionnaire designed to be accessible for individuals with visual impairments. The questionnaire covered demographical data, pregnancy, childbirth, puerperium period experiences and interactions with healthcare professionals. The participants included in the present study ranged in age from 29 to >35 years. The origins of their total or partial blindness varied. As shown by the results, ~45.5% of the participants considered they received equivalent levels of midwifery and gynecological care compared to women without visual impairments, and half of the participants reported that midwives and gynecologists were willing to provide such care. However, the majority (90.9%) indicated a lack of adequate knowledge among healthcare providers regarding the specific perinatal care needs of women who are visually impaired. These findings underscore the critical need for the specialized training for healthcare providers and the development of more inclusive, accessible healthcare practices to improve perinatal care for women who are visually impaired.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.