Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257916›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Preparation for implementation of evidence-based practices in urban schools: A shared process with implementing partners.

Ricardo Eiraldi, Rachel Comly, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Quinn Rabenau-McDonnell, Barry L McCurdy, Muniya S Khanna, Abbas F Jawad, Jayme Banks, Stacina Clark, Kristina M Popkin and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Digital media balance and mental health: effects of a school-based program.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ricardo EiraldiRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3997-696X
Rachel ComlyRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Courtney Benjamin WolkDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Quinn Rabenau-McDonnellRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Barry L McCurdySchool of Professional & Applied Psychology, Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Muniya S KhannaOCD and Anxiety Institute, Bryn Mawr, PA, USA.
Abbas F JawadRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jayme BanksSchool District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stacina ClarkSchool District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kristina M PopkinSchool District of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Tara WilsonRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Kathryn HensonRoberts Center for Pediatric Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Sustainment of Mental Health Supports in Under-Resourced Urban SchoolsR01MH122465 · NIMH · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI EIRALDI, RICARDO B · 2021 to 2025
$3.8M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122465
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Shifting organizational priorities can negatively affect the sustainment of innovations in community settings. Shifting priorities can present barriers to conducting clinical research in schools if a misalignment occurs between school district priorities and the aims of the study. Often this misalignment occurs due to a shift during the period between when the study is submitted for funding and when research activities begin. Participatory research approaches can be employed to restore alignment between study processes and school district priorities. The purpose of the study is to describe data from a shared process with district partners. The shared process resulted in modifications to the main study's implementation processes and strategies in order to restore alignment with evolving school priorities while remaining faithful to the aims of the study. Method: Data originated from qualitative interviews conducted with 20 school district and school personnel in a large urban school district. Qualitative themes were organized into categories based on a social-ecological school implementation framework. Data from team meetings, meetings with school district administrators, and emails served to supplement and verify findings from interview analyses. Results: Themes included barriers and facilitators at the macro-, school-, individual-, team-, and implementation quality levels. Adaptations were made to address barriers and facilitators and restore alignment with school district priorities. Most adaptations to study processes and implementation strategies focused on re-training and providing more information to school district coaches and school-based staff. New procedures were created, and resources were re-allocated for the larger study. Conclusions: Findings were discussed in relation to the implementation literature in schools. Recommendations for sustaining strong collaboration among researchers and school partners are provided.

Indexed as

evidence-based practicesprotocol adaptationsshared processurban schools

Identifiers

PMID39257916
PMCPMC11384528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.