ArticleDigital health
Utilization and engagement with an employer-provided digital mental health platform: An international perspective.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Addressing the Gap: Real-World Evidence of Technology-Enabled Coaching Services for Mental Health.Administration and policy in mental health · 2025Article
- Improvements in physical activity and depression symptoms: an observational study of users of a multi-modal digital mental health platform.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study (2020-2022) compared the usage patterns across international regions of an employer-provided digital mental health platform, which is available in native languages and offers both self-guided digital activities and one-on-one sessions. Methods: Routine data from the platform were analyzed by describing the demographic profile of 178,119 users from different geographical regions, their baseline mental health status and burnout levels, as well as patterns of engagement. Statistical analyses were conducted using logistic and ordered logit models to examine the association between cumulative engagement with the platform over time and baseline characteristics. Results: The platform had high engagement and satisfaction levels across regions and age groups. Female users were more engaged than males in both self-guided digital activities and one-on-one sessions. Older users and those from non-US regions were more engaged in self-guided digital activities, while younger users and those from the US were more engaged in one-on-one sessions. Symptoms of anxiety were also associated with engagement with one-on-one sessions. Conclusions: The study's findings provide valuable insights into the benefits of digital platforms in addressing mental health needs of employers from different regions. Future research should focus on exploring the specific factors that influence engagement with digital mental health platforms and how these platforms can be optimized and tailored to better serve diverse populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.