ArticleDigital health
A method combining LDA and neural networks for antitumor drug efficacy prediction.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Progress and current trends in prediction models for the occurrence and prognosis of cancer and cancer-related complications: a bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial Intelligence for Drug Safety Across the Lifecycle and Decision Type: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- DrugBERT: a BERT-based approach integrating LDA topic embedding and efficacy-aware mechanism for predicting anti-tumor drug efficacy.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Personalized medicine has gained more attention for cancer precision treatment due to patient genetic heterogeneity in recent years. However, predicting the efficacy of antitumor drugs in advance remains a significant challenge to achieve this task. Objective: This study aims to predict the efficacy of antitumor drugs in individual cancer patients based on clinical data. Methods: This paper proposes to predict personalized antitumor drug efficacy based on clinical data. Specifically, we encode the clinical text of cancer patients as a probability distribution vector in hidden topics space using the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model, named LDA representation. Then, a neural network is designed, and the LDA representation is input into the neural network to predict drug response in cancer patients treated with platinum drugs. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed method, we gathered and organized clinical records of lung and bowel cancer patients who underwent platinum-based treatment. The prediction performance is assessed using the following metrics: Precision, Recall, F1-score, Accuracy, and Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC). Results: The study analyzed a dataset of 958 patients with non-small cell cancer treated with antitumor drugs. The proposed method achieved a stratified 5-fold cross-validation average Precision of 0.81, Recall of 0.89, F1-score of 0.85, Accuracy of 0.77, and AUC of 0.81 for cisplatin efficacy prediction on the data, which most are better than those of previous methods. Of these, the AUC value is at least 4% higher than those of the previous. At the same time, the superior result over the previous method persisted on an independent dataset of 266 bowel cancer patients, showing the generalizability of the proposed method. These results demonstrate the potential value of precise tumor treatment in clinical practice. Conclusions: Combining LDA and neural networks can help predict the efficacy of antitumor drugs based on clinical text. Our approach outperforms previous methods in predicting drug clinical efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.