RevieweNeurologicalSci2024
Navigating the clinical landscape of artery of Percheron infarction: A systematic review.
Review in eNeurologicalSci, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction: percheron syndrome -a case report.International journal of surgery case reports · 2026Article
- Acute ischemic stroke caused by Percheron artery occlusion after vertebral artery stent placement: a case report.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Case Report: Three cases involving the use of endovascular intervention for artery of Percheron infarction with a unilateral fetal-type posterior cerebral artery.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Artery of Percheron Infarction Presenting As Altered Consciousness in an Elderly Patient: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- The clinical significance of artery of Percheron in cerebral ischemia: a summary overview.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Case Report: Artery of Percheron infarction following surgical clipping of multiple intracranial aneurysms.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infarction of the artery of Percheron (AOP) is a rare vascular condition where a single arterial branch supplies blood to the thalamic and midbrain regions, leading to neurological deficits. The challenge lies in its often-delayed diagnosis due to its rarity and diverse clinical presentations, necessitating heightened awareness among clinicians for expedited diagnosis and appropriate therapeutic interventions. Materials and methods: All relevant studies involving patients diagnosed with infarction of AOP were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus. Only human studies that were published in full English-language reports were included. Included in the search were the terms "Artery of Percheron," "infarction," "stroke," and "demarcation". Age, gender, presenting symptoms, treatment, recovery time, and outcome of patients with AOP infarction were all recorded. Results: A systematic review was conducted on a total of 530 articles, out of which 130 articles met the specified requirements. The average age is 59, with men comprising 57.7% of the population. The symptoms reported were visual disturbance in 43.9% of cases and changed mental state in 77.2% of cases. Treatment options include conservative management (85.4%), thrombolysis (11.3%), and other approaches. The optimal age range for recovery is between 41 and 50 years old. Conclusion: Our study on acute AOP infarction highlights male predominance, common comorbidities like hypertension and diabetes, and prevalent symptoms including visual disturbance and altered mental state. Early recognition is crucial, with thrombolytic therapy within the critical time window showing promising outcomes. These findings offer insights for enhanced clinical management of AOP infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.