ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Radiographic imaging and diagnosis of spinal bone tumors: AlexNet and ResNet for the classification of tumor malignancy.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Performance comparison and future perspectives of deep learning and classical machine learning in bone tumor applications: a systematic review (2019-2025).BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Intelligent Orthopedics: Machine Learning in Diagnosis of Bone Disease, Implants, and Bone Health Monitoring.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Impact of quantization on various CNN architectures for bone fracture detection.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
- A deep learning and radiomics fusion model enhances endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis of gastric tumors.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Primary Malignant Bone Tumor Imaging: A Narrative Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Automatic Segmentation and Molecular Subtype Classification of Breast Cancer Using an MRI-based Deep Learning Framework.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the application of radiographic imaging and image recognition algorithms, particularly AlexNet and ResNet, in classifying malignancies for spinal bone tumors. Methods: We selected a cohort of 580 patients diagnosed with primary spinal osseous tumors who underwent treatment at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2023, whereby 1532 images (679 images of benign tumors, 853 images of malignant tumors) were extracted from this imaging dataset. Training and validation follow a ratio of 2:1. All patients underwent X-ray examinations as part of their diagnostic workup. This study employed convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to categorize spinal bone tumor images according to their malignancy. AlexNet and ResNet models were employed for this classification task. These models were fine-tuned through training, which involved the utilization of a database of bone tumor images representing different categories. Results: Through rigorous experimentation, the performance of AlexNet and ResNet in classifying spinal bone tumor malignancy was extensively evaluated. The models were subjected to an extensive dataset of bone tumor images, and the following results were observed. AlexNet: This model exhibited commendable efficiency during training, with each epoch taking an average of 3 s. Its classification accuracy was found to be approximately 95.6 %. ResNet: The ResNet model showed remarkable accuracy in image classification. After an extended training period, it achieved a striking 96.2 % accuracy rate, signifying its proficiency in distinguishing the malignancy of spinal bone tumors. However, these results illustrate the clear advantage of AlexNet in terms of proficiency despite a lower classification accuracy. The robust performance of the ResNet model is auspicious when accuracy is more favored in the context of diagnosing spinal bone tumor malignancy, albeit at the cost of longer training times, with each epoch taking an average of 32 s. Conclusion: Integrating deep learning and CNN-based image recognition technology offers a promising solution for qualitatively classifying bone tumors. This research underscores the potential of these models in enhancing the diagnosis and treatment processes for patients, benefiting both patients and medical professionals alike. The study highlights the significance of selecting appropriate models, such as ResNet, to improve accuracy in image recognition tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.