Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257651›Full record

ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024

Does liquid nitrogen recycled autograft for treatment of bone sarcoma impact local recurrence rate? A systematic review.

Ana Cecilia Belzarena, James L Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ana Cecilia BelzarenaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.
James L CookDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, MO, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gold standard treatment for primary bone sarcomas has been surgical resection with wide margins. However, there is no consensus regarding an optimal method for limb salvage reconstruction. In 2005, a technique for recycling resected bone after intraoperative treatment with liquid nitrogen was described. This technique has been reported to have a spectrum of advantages; nonetheless, acceptance for routine use has been limited, primarily for fear of local recurrence. A systematic search of the literature using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed. Full-text articles published between 2008 and 2023 were included if the study presented sufficient information regarding patients with a diagnosis of a primary bone sarcoma of the limbs or pelvis who had undergone reconstruction with liquid nitrogen recycled autografts. Sixteen studies that included 286 patients met criteria for analyses. Local recurrence occurred in 25 patients (8.7 %) during the first 4 years following limb salvage reconstruction using recycled autografts for treatment of primary bone sarcomas, which compares favorably to the 15-30 % local recurrence rates reported for patients undergoing limb salvage reconstruction using artificial implants. Systematic synthesis of the current evidence regarding local recurrence rates following use of the liquid nitrogen recycled autograft technique for limb salvage reconstruction after bone sarcoma resection suggests a favorable comparison to other limb salvage reconstruction options. As such, this technique warrants further consideration as a viable option for indicated patients based on relative advantages regarding costs, availability, and biologic and surgical reconstruction benefits.

Indexed as

Bone sarcomaLiquid nitrogenRecycled autograft

Identifiers

PMID39257651
PMCPMC11381902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.