Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257647›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2024

Beyond the Buzz: Do Energy Drinks Offer More Than Caffeine for Mental and Physical Tasks?

Flavia Pereira, Cassandra Evans, Jose Rojas, Jason Curtis, Alyana Andal, Hena Thakkar, Robert Rocanelli, Cesar Castillo Rodriguez, Juan Carlos Santana, Lia Jiannine and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Flavia PereiraDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Rocky Mountain University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Cassandra EvansDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Jose RojasDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Rocky Mountain University, Provo, Utah, USA.
Jason CurtisDepartment of Exercise & Sport Science, Keiser University, West Palm Beach, FL, USA.
Alyana AndalDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Hena ThakkarDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Robert RocanelliDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Cesar Castillo RodriguezDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Juan Carlos SantanaInstitute of Human Performance, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Lia JiannineDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.
Jose AntonioDepartment of Health and Human Performance, Nova Southeastern University, Davie, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Energy drinks are marketed for enhancing mental and physical performance, often containing ingredients beyond caffeine. This study investigated whether an energy drink (ED), Gorilla Mind, exerted greater effects on sustained attention, mood, handgrip strength, and push-up performance than a caffeine-matched control drink (CAF) in exercise-trained individuals (n = 21, age: 22 ± 5.9 years). In a randomized, counterbalanced, crossover design, participants first completed tests assessing mood (Profile of Mood States; POMS), sustained attention (Psychomotor Vigilance Test; PVT), handgrip strength (HG), and 1-minute maximum push-up performance (PU). They then consumed either an ED or CAF drink (200mg caffeine) in a randomized order. After 45 minutes, the tests were repeated. Following a 1-week washout period, participants returned to consume the other drink and completed the same protocol. While the ED group improved reaction time (PVT), the Delta score between ED and CAF was not statistically significant (p = 0.3391). No significant differences were found between ED and CAF groups for other measures (POMS: p = 0.152, HG: p = 0.499, PU: p = 0.209). These findings suggest that the additional ingredients in the ED may not offer substantial benefits beyond caffeine for these measures in active individuals. It is important to note that the caffeine dose was, on average, less than 3.0 mg/kg body mass, which may have influenced the outcomes.

Indexed as

alertnessCognitive functionenergyphysical performancepsychomotor vigilance

Identifiers

PMID39257647
PMCPMC11385283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.