Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257627›Full record

ArticlePEC innovation2024

Co-designing a motivational interviewing training platform to enhance oncology healthcare professional communication.

Thu Ha Dang, Chris Ludlow, Hannah Borle, Marliese Alexander, Nilmini Wickramasinghe, Kate Burbury, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Penelope Schofield

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PEC innovation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thu Ha DangDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Chris LudlowDepartment of Psychological Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Hannah BorleNorthern Health, Victoria, Australia.
Marliese AlexanderPharmacy Department, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nilmini WickramasingheOptus Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Kate BurburySir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Prem Prakash JayaramanFactory of the Future and Digital Innovation Lab, Department of Computer Science and Software Engineering, School Software and Electrical Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Penelope SchofieldOptus Digital Health, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oncology healthcare professionals (HCPs) using motivational interviewing may motivate and support patients with chronic illness to adhere to medications. Research of online motivational interviewing training focusing on medication adherence in cancer is limited. Objective: Co-design, develop, and preliminarily evaluate a motivational interviewing training platform (MITP) for oncology HCPs focused on medication adherence. Methods: We used co-design and design science research methodology to develop and test the MITP in two phases: 1) program co-design and development and 2) interactive platform design and development. Results: HCPs expressed a high demand for a practical and tailored motivational interviewing training. MITP is an online three-hour training comprising education, roleplay videos, and formative assessments. MITP was reported to be acceptable, usable, and useful by users. Innovation: This study used a novel approach combining co-design and design science research methodology, and digital media to develop a flexible and acceptable online motivational interviewing training focused on medication adherence in cancer. Discussion and conclusion: Applied rigorous methodology ensured the MITP was developed to address knowledge gaps and the needs of oncology HCPs for supporting patient adherence, and to be usable and useful. Study findings may inform future research on online motivational interviewing training and its potential impact on medication adherence.

Indexed as

Co-designMedication adherenceMotivational interviewingOnlineTraining

Identifiers

PMID39257627
PMCPMC11385463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.