ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2024
Assessment of functional and radiological outcomes of suprapatellar and infrapatellar approaches of tibial nailing in patients with tibial shaft fracture: A randomized control study.
Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparison of suprapatellar and infrapatellar intramedullary nailing for tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Comparative Analysis of Suprapatellar and Infrapatellar Nailing in Tibial Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Study.Journal of orthopaedic case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study aimed to assess functional and radiological outcomes of the suprapatellar approach (SPA) and infrapatellar approaches (IPA) of tibial nailing in patients with closed tibia shaft fractures. Method: After Institutional Ethical Committee (IEC) and Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) approval, patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture type 42 were enrolled from August 2021 and August 2022 at a level I trauma centre and randomized to SPA and IPA with informed consent. Demographics, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) physical grading, intraoperative fluoroscopy time, operative duration, bleeding, postoperative radiographic alignment, and union were compared among both approaches. Functional parameters like Lysholm knee score, Anterior knee pain (AKP), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score upon kneeling, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), KOOS Patellofemoral score (KOOS PF), EuroQol (EQ5D5L), Forgotten joint score (FJS), Range of motion (ROM) of knee and any complications were assessed at 3,6 and 12 months postoperatively. Results: Per protocol analysis of 50 patients (25 SPA, 25 IPA) done at the end of the study. SPA group had significantly lesser fluoroscopy time (91.28 ± 12.40s vs. 105.36 ± 9.23s, p < 0.001) and operative duration (mins) (123.80 ± 24.25 vs. 130.00 ± 18.20, p < 0.001) than IPA. No significant differences were noted in Lysholm knee score at three months (p = 0.094), six months (p = 0.406), and 12 months (p = 0.071). The SPA group showed significantly lower VAS Score upon kneeling at six months (p < 0.0001). Similarly, KOOS (p < 0.001), KOOS PF (p = 0.01), and EQ 5D5L (p = 0.03) were significantly better in the SPA group at six months postoperatively. Lower Coronal translation was found in SPA [0 (0-1.8) vs. 1.4 (0.9-1.8), p = 0.010]. Whereas, IPA had higher range of flexion at 3 months [130.0 (129.0-135.0) vs 123.1 (120.0-130.5), p = 0.047]. However, no significant differences were noted in blood loss, AKP, FJS, EQ-VAS, coronal angulation, sagittal malalignment, time to union, return to work and postoperative complications among the groups. Conclusion: SPA has lesser surgery time, more straightforward anatomic fracture reduction, better fracture alignment, lesser radiation exposure for both patients and surgeons, quicker recovery time, and promotes early kneeling activities with similar long-term functional outcomes and union rates, and can be considered in routine clinical practice than conventional IPA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.