Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257570›Full record

ArticleEvolutionary applications2024

Genomic Diversity as a Key Conservation Criterion: Proof-of-Concept From Mammalian Whole-Genome Resequencing Data.

Jong Yoon Jeon, Andrew N Black, Erangi J Heenkenda, Andrew J Mularo, Gina F Lamka, Safia Janjua, Anna Brüniche-Olsen, John W Bickham, Janna R Willoughby, J Andrew DeWoody

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolutionary applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolutionary applications · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jong Yoon JeonDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2840-8425
Andrew N BlackDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.
Erangi J HeenkendaDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-7848
Andrew J MularoDepartment of Biological Sciences Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.
Gina F LamkaCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6785-4831
Safia JanjuaDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.
Anna Brüniche-OlsenCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Globe Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark.
John W BickhamDepartment of Ecology and Conservation Biology Texas A&M University College Station Texas USA.
Janna R WilloughbyCollege of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment Auburn University Auburn Alabama USA.
J Andrew DeWoodyDepartment of Forestry and Natural Resources Purdue University West Lafayette Indiana USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many international, national, state, and local organizations prioritize the ranking of threatened and endangered species to help direct conservation efforts. For example, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) assesses the Green Status of species and publishes the influential Red List of threatened species. Unfortunately, such conservation yardsticks do not explicitly consider genetic or genomic diversity (GD), even though GD is positively associated with contemporary evolutionary fitness, individual viability, and with future evolutionary potential. To test whether populations of genome sequences could help improve conservation assessments, we estimated GD metrics from 82 publicly available mammalian datasets and examined their statistical association with attributes related to conservation. We also considered intrinsic biological factors, including trophic level and body mass, that could impact GD and quantified their relative influences. Our results identify key population GD metrics that are both reflective and predictive of IUCN conservation categories. Specifically, our analyses revealed that Watterson's theta (the population mutation rate) and autozygosity (a product of inbreeding) are associated with the current Red List categorization, likely because demographic declines that lead to "listing" decisions also reduce levels of standing genetic variation. We argue that by virtue of this relationship, conservation organizations like IUCN could leverage emerging genome sequence data to help categorize Red List threat rankings (especially in otherwise data-deficient species) and/or enhance Green Status assessments to establish a baseline for future population monitoring. Thus, our paper (1) outlines the theoretical and empirical justification for a new GD-based assessment criterion, (2) provides a bioinformatic pipeline for estimating GD from population genomic data, and (3) suggests an analytical framework that can be used to measure baseline GD while providing quantitative GD context for consideration by conservation authorities.

Indexed as

autozygosityeffective population sizeevolutionary potentialgenetic diversityheterozygositysustainabilityWatterson's theta

Identifiers

PMID39257570
PMCPMC11386325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.