ArticleFood chemistry: X2024
Monitoring fish freshness with pH-sensitive hydrogel films containing quercetin or eucalyptol.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparation and characterization of zeolite imidazole framework-8@quercetin nanoparticle/sodium alginate/L-cysteine/calcium ion hydrogel films for fruit preservation.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Preparation and Characterization of Bio-Based Freshness Indicator Labels Loaded with Natural Pigments with High Stability and Sensitivity.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research developed pH-sensitive smart films using carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and collagen (COL), combined with either quercetin (QCT) or eucalyptol (EUC), to prevent fish meat spoilage. COL, extracted from isinglass, was confirmed as type I through SDS-PAGE. The films were characterized using FESEM, FTIR, and TGA. The addition of QCT or EUC enhanced antioxidant levels to 60.16% and 70.83%, respectively, up from a baseline of 10.4%. It also increased tensile strength from 3.32 ± 0.22 to 11.8 ± 0.25 and 13.2 ± 0.27 MPa, and enhanced elongation at break from 5 ± 3.1% to 27.7 ± 1.1% and 30.15 ± 2.1%. Fish meat packaged with QCT showed a lower spoilage rate due to the antibacterial and antioxidant effects of EUC and QCT (TVBN = 7.37 ± 0.01), compared to CMC/COL film (TVBN = 10.11 ± 0.02) and non-packaged fish (TVBN = 11.23 ± 0.01). The films exhibit >80% transparency, highlighting their suitability for food packaging. CMC/COL/QCT is preferred for fish packaging because it offers better mechanical properties and lower TVB-N levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.