Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257484›Full record

ArticlePersonalized medicine in psychiatry

Trajectory Modeling and Response Prediction in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Depression.

Aaron N McInnes, Sarah T Olsen, Christi R P Sullivan, Dawson C Cooper, Saydra Wilson, Ayse Irem Sonmez, C Sophia Albott, Stephen C Olson, Carol B Peterson, Barry R Rittberg and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personalized medicine in psychiatry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Aaron N McInnesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sarah T OlsenDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Christi R P SullivanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Dawson C CooperDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Saydra WilsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ayse Irem SonmezDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
C Sophia AlbottDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Stephen C OlsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Carol B PetersonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Barry R RittbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alexander HermanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Matej BajzerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Ziad NahasDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Alik S WidgeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Funding

Using Computation to Achieve Breakthroughs in NeuroscienceT32MH115886 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI REDISH, A DAVID · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Parametrically Detailed Computational Analyses of Human Foraging BehaviorR21MH120785 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI MACDONALD, ANGUS W, REDISH, A DAVID · 2019 to 2020
$424k
NIMH NIH HHS R21 MH120785NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH115886
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) therapy could be improved by more accurate and earlier prediction of response. Latent class mixture (LCMM) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modeling have been applied to model the trajectories of antidepressant response (or non-response) to TMS, but it is not known whether such models are useful in predicting clinically meaningful change in symptom severity, i.e. categorical (non)response as opposed to continuous scores. Methods: We compared LCMM and NLME approaches to model the antidepressant response to TMS in a naturalistic sample of 238 patients receiving rTMS for treatment resistant depression, across multiple coils and protocols. We then compared the predictive power of those models. Results: LCMM trajectories were influenced largely by baseline symptom severity, but baseline symptoms provided little predictive power for later antidepressant response. Rather, the optimal LCMM model was a nonlinear two-class model that accounted for baseline symptoms. This model accurately predicted patient response at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.70, 95% CI = [0.52 - 0.87]), but not before. NLME offered slightly improved predictive performance at 4 weeks of treatment (AUC = 0.76, 95% CI = [0.58 - 0.94], but likewise, not before. Conclusions: In showing the predictive validity of these approaches to model response trajectories to rTMS, we provided preliminary evidence that trajectory modeling could be used to guide future treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Depressive DisorderLatent class analysisnonlinear mixed modelPatient-Specific ModelingTreatment-Resistant

Identifiers

PMID39257484
PMCPMC11382337

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.