ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2024
Optimising infliximab induction dosing to achieve clinical remission in Chinese patients with Crohn's disease.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Determination of correlation of clearance with clinical outcomes for inflammatory bowel disease.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Trial
- Pharmacokinetic Model Selection for Personalized Infliximab Dosing in IBD.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: A strategy based on therapeutic drug monitoring and population pharmacokinetic (popPK) models would likely increase the rate of clinical remission (CR) after infliximab (IFX) induction in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between early IFX levels and antibodies to infliximab (ATI) and CR at week 14 and simulate the probability of attaining the identified exposure target. Methods: Patients with CD (n = 140) treated with IFX were enrolled to develop the popPK model. Of these, 43 moderate-to-severe patients with CD were followed up at week 14. Simulations were performed on patients with different dosage regimens and covariates. Results: IFX levels >20.08 μg/mL at week 2, >18.44 μg/mL at week 6, and >3.08 μg/mL at week 14 were linked to CR. A one-compartment model fit the data best. The covariates influencing clearance were fat free mass, albumin and ATI levels. To achieve IFX levels >20.08 μg/mL at week 2, ≥400 mg IFX was predicted to be required in over 50% patients with 45-70 kg and 35-45 g/L albumin, except for patients with 70 kg and 30 g/L albumin. Conclusion: IFX levels >20.08 μg/mL at week 2 and absence of ATI at week 14 are associated with CR. Optimising IFX induction dosing will be critical to achieve the target of early IFX levels associated with CR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.