ReviewOphthalmic genetics2024
A novel large multi-gene deletion in syndromic choroideremia.
Review in Ophthalmic genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCaused by mutation or deletion of the
methodsCase report and review of literature.
resultsWe present a case of a 46-year-old male with a prior clinical diagnosis of syndromic retinitis pigmentosa, who was found to have syndromic choroideremia associated with a novel multi-gene deletion of 13.5 megabase pairs. This deletion encompassing 18 genes is one of the largest deletions reported in the literature. A total of 18 male cases of choroideremia associated with confirmed large or contiguous gene deletions have been published to date. Previously reported deletions range in size from 4 to 15 megabase pairs, and observed phenotypes include cleft lip and palate, ptosis, obesity, metabolic diseases, developmental delay, and hearing loss. DISCUSSION: The contribution of our case aims to expand our understanding of Xq21 deletions and prompts further investigation of genes found in this locus. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of including syndromic choroideremia on the differential diagnosis in the workup of other syndromic retinopathies, particularly those that feature obesity, hearing loss, or intellectual disability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.