Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39257236›Full record

SynthesisJournal of surgical oncology2025

Systematic Review of Robotic-Assisted Peripheral and Central Lymphatic Surgery.

Carlotta Imholz, Lisanne Grünherz, Nicole Lindenblatt

Erratum issuedAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Lymphovenous Bypass: Past, Present, and Future.Archives of plastic surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The first total robotic-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis: prospects for innovation and future development.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carlotta ImholzDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lisanne GrünherzDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nicole LindenblattDepartment of Plastic and Hand Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0293-1004

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRobotic-assisted lymphatic reconstruction has gained increasing interest over the past few years.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to systematically investigate the benefits of robotic-assisted lymphatic surgery based on currently published literature.

methodsA systematic review evaluating the feasibility, surgical aspects, and both objective and subjective improvements in patients with impairment of the peripheral or central lymphatic system was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered on PROSPERO.

resultsThe literature search yielded 328 articles after the removal of duplicates, followed by a full-text review of the 29 articles, out of which a total of 11 relevant articles were deemed eligible. Among these, seven used a retrospective design and four a prospective design. All studies included confirmed the feasibility of robotic-assisted lymphatic surgery and reported promising results concerning both technical aspects and patient-related outcomes. However, currently, only a limited number of studies directly compare the robotic-assisted approach to the manual approach, and these studies have limited statistical analyses.

conclusionDespite the heterogeneous measurands, all studies showed the feasibility of robotic-assisted lymphatic surgery, and seven provided promising data on patient-related outcomes. Additional studies are needed to further identify future directions in robotic-assisted lymphatic surgery.

Indexed as

Robotic Surgical ProceduresHumanscentral lymphatic surgerylymphatic surgeryrobotic‐assisted central lymphatic surgeryrobotic‐assisted lymphatic surgeryrobotic‐assisted microsurgerythoracic duct–vein anastomosis

Identifiers

PMID39257236
PMCPMC11874190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.