Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256852›Full record

ArticleHuman genomics2024

AI-derived comparative assessment of the performance of pathogenicity prediction tools on missense variants of breast cancer genes.

Rahaf M Ahmad, Bassam R Ali, Fatma Al-Jasmi, Noura Al Dhaheri, Saeed Al Turki, Praseetha Kizhakkedath, Mohd Saberi Mohamad

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Functional Evaluation ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rahaf M AhmadHealth Data Science Lab, Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-7531-5264
Bassam R AliDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-1306-6618
Fatma Al-JasmiHealth Data Science Lab, Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-0792-9598
Noura Al DhaheriHealth Data Science Lab, Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0002-1384-2915
Saeed Al TurkiHealth Data Science Lab, Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-336X
Praseetha KizhakkedathDepartment of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID 0000-0003-2687-6476
Mohd Saberi MohamadHealth Data Science Lab, Department of Genetics and Genomics, College of Medical and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Tawam road, Al Maqam district, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. saberi@uaeu.ac.ae.ORCID 0000-0002-1079-4559

Funding

United Arab Emirates University Strategic Research Program (#12R111)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) can exert substantial and extremely variable impacts on various cellular functions, making accurate predictions of their consequences challenging, albeit crucial especially in clinical settings such as in oncology. Laboratory-based experimental methods for assessing these effects are time-consuming and often impractical, highlighting the importance of in-silico tools for variant impact prediction. However, the performance metrics of currently available tools on breast cancer missense variants from benchmarking databases have not been thoroughly investigated, creating a knowledge gap in the accurate prediction of pathogenicity. In this study, the benchmarking datasets ClinVar and HGMD were used to evaluate 21 Artificial Intelligence (AI)-derived in-silico tools. Missense variants in breast cancer genes were extracted from ClinVar and HGMD professional v2023.1. The HGMD dataset focused on pathogenic variants only, to ensure balance, benign variants for the same genes were included from the ClinVar database. Interestingly, our analysis of both datasets revealed variants across genes with varying penetrance levels like low and moderate in addition to high, reinforcing the value of disease-specific tools. The top-performing tools on ClinVar dataset identified were MutPred (Accuracy = 0.73), Meta-RNN (Accuracy = 0.72), ClinPred (Accuracy = 0.71), Meta-SVM, REVEL, and Fathmm-XF (Accuracy = 0.70). While on HGMD dataset they were ClinPred (Accuracy = 0.72), MetaRNN (Accuracy = 0.71), CADD (Accuracy = 0.69), Fathmm-MKL (Accuracy = 0.68), and Fathmm-XF (Accuracy = 0.67). These findings offer clinicians and researchers valuable insights for selecting, improving, and developing effective in-silico tools for breast cancer pathogenicity prediction. Bridging this knowledge gap contributes to advancing precision medicine and enhancing diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for breast cancer patients with potential implications for other conditions.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBreast NeoplasmsDatabases, GeneticMutation, MissensePolymorphism, Single NucleotideComputational BiologyFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansSoftwareArtificial intelligence (AI)Breast cancerHealth data sciencePathogenicity prediction toolsSingle nucleotide variants (SNVs)

Identifiers

PMID39256852
PMCPMC11389290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.