ArticleJournal of biological engineering2024
Soil microbiome characterization and its future directions with biosensing.
Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-driven advancements in agricultural biotechnology.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Smartphone-based multispectral autofluorescence analysis of bacteria mixtures of staphylococci using convolutional neural network.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Article
- Harnessing plant microbiomes to enhance crop resilience and restore war-affected soils in Ukraine.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Materials Advances for Distributed Environmental Sensor Networks at Scale.Nature reviews. Materials · 2026Article
- DMM-YOLO: A high efficiency soil fauna detection model based on an adaptive dynamic shuffle mechanism.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metataxonomics Characterization of Soil Microbiome Extraction Method Using Different Dispersant Solutions.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Cultivable and Non-Cultivable Approach to Bacteria from Undisturbed Soil with Plant Growth-Promoting Capacity.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Soil microbiome characterization is typically achieved with next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques. Metabarcoding is very common, and meta-omics is growing in popularity. These techniques have been instrumental in microbiology, but they have limitations. They require extensive time, funding, expertise, and computing power to be effective. Moreover, these techniques are restricted to controlled laboratory conditions; they are not applicable in field settings, nor can they rapidly generate data. This hinders using NGS as an environmental monitoring tool or an in-situ checking device. Biosensing technology can be applied to soil microbiome characterization to overcome these limitations and to complement NGS techniques. Biosensing has been used in biomedical applications for decades, and many successful commercial products are on the market. Given its previous success, biosensing has much to offer soil microbiome characterization. There is a great variety of biosensors and biosensing techniques, and a few in particular are better suited for soil field studies. Aptamers are more stable than enzymes or antibodies and are more ready for field-use biosensors. Given that any microbiome is complex, a multiplex sensor will be needed, and with large, complicated datasets, machine learning might benefit these analyses. If the signals from the biosensors are optical, a smartphone can be used as a portable optical reader and potential data-analyzing device. Biosensing is a rich field that couples engineering and biology, and applying its toolset to help advance soil microbiome characterization would be a boon to microbiology more broadly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.