ArticleBMC medicine2024
A deep learning model for differentiating paediatric intracranial germ cell tumour subtypes and predicting survival with MRI: a multicentre prospective study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intracranial germ cell tumors: an underrecognized diagnostic consideration in adults with sellar/suprasellar lesions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Classification of histology and molecular subtypes of brain gliomas and glioneuronal and neuronal tumors using a deep learning approach.European radiology · 2026Article
- The Expanding Frontier: The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Neuroradiology.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe pretherapeutic differentiation of subtypes of primary intracranial germ cell tumours (iGCTs), including germinomas (GEs) and nongerminomatous germ cell tumours (NGGCTs), is essential for clinical practice because of distinct treatment strategies and prognostic profiles of these diseases. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model, iGNet, to assist in the differentiation and prognostication of iGCT subtypes by employing pretherapeutic MR T2-weighted imaging.
methodsThe iGNet model, which is based on the nnUNet architecture, was developed using a retrospective dataset of 280 pathologically confirmed iGCT patients. The training dataset included 83 GEs and 117 NGGCTs, while the retrospective internal test dataset included 31 GEs and 49 NGGCTs. The model's diagnostic performance was then assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a prospective internal dataset (n = 22) and two external datasets (n = 22 and 20). Next, we compared the diagnostic performance of six neuroradiologists with or without the assistance of iGNet. Finally, the predictive ability of the output of iGNet for progression-free and overall survival was assessed and compared to that of the pathological diagnosis.
resultsiGNet achieved high diagnostic performance, with AUCs between 0.869 and 0.950 across the four test datasets. With the assistance of iGNet, the six neuroradiologists' diagnostic AUCs (averages of the four test datasets) increased by 9.22% to 17.90%. There was no significant difference between the output of iGNet and the results of pathological diagnosis in predicting progression-free and overall survival (P = .889).
conclusionsBy leveraging pretherapeutic MR imaging data, iGNet accurately differentiates iGCT subtypes, facilitating prognostic evaluation and increasing the potential for tailored treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.