Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256689›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

COVID testing hesitancy among pregnant patients: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic about the unique needs and challenges of medically complex populations.

Ruth M Farrell, Caitlin Dahler, Rachel Pope, Ellen Divoky, Christina Collart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruth M FarrellObstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, A8, Cleveland, OH, USA. farrelr@ccf.org.
Caitlin DahlerLorain County Public Health, 9880 Murray Ridge Road, Elyria, OH, USA.
Rachel PopeDivision of Female Sexual Health, University Hospitals Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 11100 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ellen DivokyUniversity Hospitals Urology Institute, University Hospitals of Cleveland, 111000 Euclid Ave Cleveland Ave, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Christina CollartObstetrics & Gynecology Institute, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, A8, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of ClevelandUL1TR002548 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCOMSEY, GRACE A · 2018 to 2022
$35.5M
Clinical and Translational Science Collaborative of Northern Ohio, Catalyzing Linkages to Equity in Health (CLE Health)UM1TR004528 · NCATS · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI GRACE A MCCOMSEY · 2023 to 2026
$32.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002548NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR002548NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnant patients were a significant population to consider during the pandemic, given the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection on obstetric outcomes. While COVID testing was a central pillar of infection control, it became apparent that a subset of the population declined to test. At the same time, data emerged about pregnant persons also declining testing. Yet, it was unknown why pregnant patients declined tests and if those reasons were similar or different from those of the general population. We conducted this study to explore pregnant patients' attitudes, access, and utilization of COVID-19 testing to support healthcare for infection prevention management for this unique and medically complex population.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative study of patients who were currently or recently pregnant during the early stages of the pandemic and received outpatient prenatal care at one of the participating study sites. An interview guide was used to conduct in-depth telephone interviews. Coding was performed using NVivo, and analysis was conducted using Grounded Theory.

resultsThe average age of the participants (N = 37) was 32 (SD 4.21) years. Most were < 35 years of age (57%) and self-described as White (68%). Qualitative analysis identified themes related to barriers to COVID-19 testing access and use during pregnancy, including concerns about test accuracy, exposure to COVID-19 in testing facilities, isolation and separation during labor and delivery, and diminished healthcare quality and patient experience.

conclusionsThe implementation of widespread and universal COVID testing policies did not address the unique needs and challenges of pregnant patients as a medically complex population. It is important to understand the reasons and implications for pregnant patients who declined COVID testing during the current pandemic to inform strategies to prevent infection spread in future public health emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 TestingPatient Acceptance of Health CarePregnancy Complications, InfectiousPrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSARS-CoV-2AdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnant PeopleCOVID-19COVID testingHealthcare qualityInfection controlPregnancyPrenatal carePublic health

Identifiers

PMID39256689
PMCPMC11384699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.