Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256675›Full record

Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024

Effects of anterior quadratus lumborum block versus erector spinae plane block on postoperative acute pain in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective, observational study.

Huseyin Turkan, Cengiz Kaya, Esra Turunc, Burhan Dost, Yasemin Burcu Ustun

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05822492 (Comparison of the Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block and Erector Spina Plane Block on Postoperative Acute Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05822492 completednot on this map

Comparison of the Effects of Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block and Erector Spina Plane Block on Postoperative Acute Pain in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorOndokuz Mayıs UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled90ConditionsAnesthesia, Analgesia, Patient Controlled Analgesia, Quadratus Lumborum BlockArmsGroup QLB3, Group ESPB, Group Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huseyin Turkan *Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Cengiz Kaya *Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Esra TuruncDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey. esra.kiymaz.ek@gmail.com.
Burhan DostDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.
Yasemin Burcu UstunDepartment of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Ondokuz Mayis University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.

Funding

Commission Presidency of Scientific Research Projects of Ondokuz Mayis University, Samsun, Turkey PYO.TIP.1904.23.005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe study aimed to compare the pain-relieving effectiveness of anterior quadratus lumborum block (QLB3) and erector spinae plane block (ESPB), both of which have been documented to provide relief during abdominal surgery.

methodsThis prospective observational study, conducted between February and July 2023, included 96 patients who had undergone percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Patients were divided into three groups: QLB3, ESPB, and control (no block) and received the corresponding nerve block in the preanesthetic room for regional block. Cumulative morphine consumption during the initial 24 h after PCNL, numerical rating scale resting/movement scores, intraoperative remifentanil usage, rescue analgesic requirements, time when the first analgesic was requested, and postoperative nausea and vomiting scores were documented and compared between the groups.

resultsTotal median morphine consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively was similar in the QLB3 and ESPB groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, 7 mg [(Q1-Q3) 7-8.5]; ESPB, 8 mg [6.5-9]; control, 12.5 [10-17]; P < 0.001). Similarly, median intraoperative remifentanil consumption did not differ between the block groups but was higher in the control group (QLB3, 1082 µg [IQR 805.5-1292.7]; ESPB, 1278 µg [940.2-1297.5]; control, 1561 µg [1315-2068]; P < 0.001). The number of patients receiving rescue analgesic medication was similar in the block groups but higher in the control group (QLB3, n = 9 [30%]; ESPB, n = 14 [46.7%]; control, n = 21 [70%]; P = 0.008).

conclusionsQLB3 and ESPB were adequate and comparable in providing postoperative analgesia as part of multimodal analgesia after PCNL.

trial registrationThe study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier: NCT05822492).

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidNephrolithotomy, PercutaneousNerve BlockPostoperative PainAbdominal MusclesAcute PainAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMorphineParaspinal MusclesProspective StudiesAnalgesics, OpioidMorphineAcute postoperative painErector Spinae plane blockNerve blockPercutaneous nephrolithotomyQuadratus lumborum blockUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID39256675
PMCPMC11386376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.