Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256672›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Human factors methods in the design of digital decision support systems for population health: a scoping review.

Holland M Vasquez, Emilie Pianarosa, Renee Sirbu, Lori M Diemert, Heather Cunningham, Vinyas Harish, Birsen Donmez, Laura C Rosella

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Holland M VasquezDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emilie PianarosaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Renee SirbuDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lori M DiemertDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Heather CunninghamGerstein Science Information Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Vinyas HarishDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Birsen DonmezDepartment of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laura C RosellaDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. laura.rosella@utoronto.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Human Factors (HF) methods have been applied to the design of decision support systems (DSS) to aid clinical decision-making, the role of HF to improve decision-support for population health outcomes is less understood. We sought to comprehensively understand how HF methods have been used in designing digital population health DSS. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe searched English documents published in health sciences and engineering databases (Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Scopus, Comendex, Inspec, IEEE Xplore) between January 1990 and September 2023 describing the development, validation or application of HF principles to decision support tools in population health.

resultsWe identified 21,581 unique records and included 153 studies for data extraction and synthesis. We included research articles that had a target end-user in population health and that used HF. HF methods were applied throughout the design lifecycle. Users were engaged early in the design lifecycle in the needs assessment and requirements gathering phase and design and prototyping phase with qualitative methods such as interviews. In later stages in the lifecycle, during user testing and evaluation, and post deployment evaluation, quantitative methods were more frequently used. However, only three studies used an experimental framework or conducted A/B testing.

conclusionsWhile HF have been applied in a variety of contexts in the design of data-driven DSSs for population health, few have used Human Factors to its full potential. We offer recommendations for how HF can be leveraged throughout the design lifecycle. Most crucially, system designers should engage with users early on and throughout the design process. Our findings can support stakeholders to further empower public health systems.

Indexed as

ErgonomicsPopulation HealthDecision Support Systems, ClinicalHumansSoftware DesignDecision-making toolHuman factors engineeringLiterature reviewPublic healthUser-centered design

Identifiers

PMID39256672
PMCPMC11385511

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.