ArticleBMC infectious diseases2024
Diagnosis and management of bacterial meningitis in adult Sudanese patients: a six years hospital based, retrospective, cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a diagnostic nomogram for post-neurosurgical bacterial meningitis.BMC neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the diagnosis and management of bacterial meningitis in adult Sudanese patients in accordance with the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines for bacterial meningitis management. PATIENTS AND
methodsA cross-sectional, retrospective study design was used to recruit all patients aged > 18 years who were diagnosed with or suspected of having bacterial meningitis and admitted to Wad Medani Teaching Hospital, Gezira State, Sudan, between January 2017 and October 2022.
resultsIn total, 201 patients were included in the analysis. The mean age of the participants was 44.1 ± 21.4 years, and 107 (53.2%) were male. Community-acquired bacterial meningitis accounted for 193 (96%) of the studied patients, and only 8 (4%) of the patients had healthcare-associated meningitis. Neuroimaging was utilized appropriately in 148 (73.6%) patients, blood cultures were not performed entirely, and lumbar puncture was seldom performed in 1 (0.5%) patient. Corticosteroids were appropriately administered to 65 (32.3%) patients, and antibiotics were administered appropriately to only 5 (2.5%) patients. Ceftriaxone 185 (76.1%) was the most frequently utilized antibiotic, followed by vancomycin 23 (9.5%). In terms of overall adherence, this study demonstrated that the IDSA guidelines were not followed at all in the treatment of patients with suspected bacterial meningitis.
conclusionThe results of this study contradict the IDSA guidelines for the standard of care for bacterial meningitis. Antibiotic regimens are often incorrect, corticosteroids are administered appropriately in approximately one-third of patients, and neuroimaging is reasonably utilized. This study raises attention to several important issues regarding the diagnosis of bacterial meningitis, including the lack of confirming microbiological tests and the reliance of the diagnosis primarily on CT and clinical examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.