Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256622›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Unmasking and quantifying racial bias of large language models in medical report generation.

Yifan Yang, Xiaoyu Liu, Qiao Jin, Furong Huang, Zhiyong Lu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Ethical Considerations in Personal Health Large Language Models.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. LLMs Can Do Medical Harm: Stress-Testing Clinical Decisions Under Social Pressure.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yifan YangNational Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4414-9176
Xiaoyu LiuUniversity of Maryland at College Park, Department of Computer Science, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Qiao JinNational Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-7239
Furong HuangUniversity of Maryland at College Park, Department of Computer Science, College Park, MD, 20742, USA.
Zhiyong LuNational Institutes of Health (NIH), National Library of Medicine (NLM), National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), Bethesda, MD, 20894, USA. zhiyong.lu@nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9998-916X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge language models like GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4 hold promise for healthcare professionals, but they may inadvertently inherit biases during their training, potentially affecting their utility in medical applications. Despite few attempts in the past, the precise impact and extent of these biases remain uncertain.

methodsWe use LLMs to generate responses that predict hospitalization, cost and mortality based on real patient cases. We manually examine the generated responses to identify biases.

resultsWe find that these models tend to project higher costs and longer hospitalizations for white populations and exhibit optimistic views in challenging medical scenarios with much higher survival rates. These biases, which mirror real-world healthcare disparities, are evident in the generation of patient backgrounds, the association of specific diseases with certain racial and ethnic groups, and disparities in treatment recommendations, etc.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the critical need for future research to address and mitigate biases in language models, especially in critical healthcare applications, to ensure fair and accurate outcomes for all patients.

Identifiers

PMID39256622
PMCPMC11387737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.