Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256602›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2024

Are measurable residual disease results after consolidation therapy useful in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

Janine Stutterheim, Rachella van der Waarden, Hester A de Groot-Kruseman, Edwin Sonneveld, Valérie de Haas, Rana Dandis, C Ellen van der Schoot, Vincent H J van der Velden, Rob Pieters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Janine StutterheimPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.stutterheim@prinsesmaximacentrum.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-0834
Rachella van der WaardenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Hester A de Groot-KrusemanPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Edwin SonneveldPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Valérie de HaasPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0339-6816
Rana DandisPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C Ellen van der SchootDepartment of Experimental Immunohematology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent H J van der Velden *Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9457-3763
Rob Pieters *Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2997-3570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measurable residual disease (MRD) is regularly tested at later timepoints after the end of first consolidation (EOC) in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The question remains whether this is useful for detecting (molecular) relapse. We investigated the clinical relevance of MRD after EOC in intermediate risk patients treated on DCOG-ALL-10 (n = 271) and DCOG-ALL-9 (n = 122), with MRD <0.05% at EOC. EOC MRD-negative patients (n = 178) had excellent outcomes, irrespective of MRD results at later timepoints; 6-year cumulative incidence of relapse (6-y CIR) of 7.4% (95% CI, 3.9%-12.3%) for those with MRD negativity at all later timepoints compared to 3.8% (95% CI, 0.3%-16.8%) for those with one or more later timepoints being positive (p = 0.51). Patients with positive EOC MRD (n = 91) of whom the subsequent timepoints were MRD negative (n = 43), had comparable good outcomes, 6-y CIR of 7.0% (95% CI, 1.8%-17.2%). In contrast, patients being MRD positive at EOC and MRD positive at one or more subsequent timepoints (n = 48) had a higher risk of relapse, 6-y CIR 29.4% (95% CI, 17.2%-42.8%), p < 0.001. These findings were confirmed in the validation cohort of ALL-9 as well as using the updated EuroMRD guidelines. In EOC MRD-negative patients, subsequent MRD measurements can be abandoned. For EOC MRD-positive patients the subsequent MRD measurement might be informative for further risk stratification.

Indexed as

Consolidation ChemotherapyNeoplasm, ResidualPrecursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaAdolescentAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMalePrognosisRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID39256602
PMCPMC11518975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.