Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256558›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Risk of relationship separation in men with Peyronie's disease in a matched Swedish cohort.

Lars Henningsohn, Henrik Larsson, Ralf Kuja-Halkola, Martin Cederlöf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lars HenningsohnDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik LarssonFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Södra Grev Rosengatan 30, 70362, Örebro, Sweden.
Ralf Kuja-HalkolaFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Södra Grev Rosengatan 30, 70362, Örebro, Sweden.
Martin CederlöfFaculty of Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Södra Grev Rosengatan 30, 70362, Örebro, Sweden. Martin.Cederlof@oru.se.

Funding

Riksbankens Jubileumsfond P21-0226
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peyronie's disease (PD) has detrimental effects on the quality of life, mental health, sexual functioning and several other aspects that increase the risk of relationship problems. However, no study to date has assessed the risk of relationship separation in med with PD. Herein, we utilized data from Swedish national registers to examine the risk of relationship separation in men with PD. We conducted a matched cohort study on men born 1933-1992, followed from 1997 to 2013. PD was defined as a physician-assigned diagnosis according to the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth version. Each man with PD (n = 8020) was matched with 10 comparison men. We defined relationship separation as (1) ever separated, and (2) separation rate. We used log-linear regression to estimate the risk ratio, and rate ratio of relationship separation. We adjusted for matching variables (birth year and country of birth), and an indicator of each follow-up year. We found that men with PD had a 13% increased risk of relationship separation (risk ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.17). The rate of relationship separation events, measured on a yearly basis, was increased by 18% (rate ratio 1.18, CI 1.12-1.24), and remained similar when adjusting for follow-up year and socio-economic status.

Indexed as

Penile IndurationAdultAgedCohort StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRegistriesRisk FactorsSwedenDivorcePenile curvaturePeyronie’s diseaseRelationship separation

Identifiers

PMID39256558
PMCPMC11387766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.