ArticleCommunications medicine2024
Prospective multicenter study using artificial intelligence to improve dermoscopic melanoma diagnosis in patient care.
Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Prospective Evidence on Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Melanoma Diagnostics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA dermatology · 2026Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence vs. dermoscopy for malignancy risk stratification of pigmented skin lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis for public health.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Equity and Generalizability of Artificial Intelligence for Skin-Lesion Diagnosis Using Clinical, Dermoscopic, and Smartphone Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial intelligence for ovarian cancer diagnosis via ultrasound: a systematic review and quantitative assessment of model performance.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- The Evolving Role of Artificial Intelligence in Dermatology: A Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance, Clinical Applications, and Implementation Challenges (2003-2025).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unique Features of Melanoma Risk and Diagnosis in Red-Haired Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Automated Skin Lesion and Cancer Detection Using Computer Vision: A Comprehensive Review.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Review
- Agentic AI for interdisciplinary clinical decision support in high-stakes care.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026Article
- When AI and Experts Agree on Error: Intrinsic Ambiguity in Dermatoscopic Images.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
- Robustness of a convolutional neural network trained on dermoscopic images and challenged with close-up images.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026Article
- Evaluating skin tone scales for dermatologic dataset labeling: a prospective-comparative study.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence and New Technologies in Melanoma Diagnosis: A Narrative Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Automated triage of cancer-suspicious skin lesions with 3D total-body photography.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: A 10-Year ClinicalTrials.gov-Based Analysis Across the Cancer Control Continuum.Cancers · 2025Review
- Multiclass Classification of Pigmented Skin Lesions Using a Multimodal Large Language Model.Cureus · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in the Non-Invasive Detection of Melanoma.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly detection of melanoma, a potentially lethal type of skin cancer with high prevalence worldwide, improves patient prognosis. In retrospective studies, artificial intelligence (AI) has proven to be helpful for enhancing melanoma detection. However, there are few prospective studies confirming these promising results. Existing studies are limited by low sample sizes, too homogenous datasets, or lack of inclusion of rare melanoma subtypes, preventing a fair and thorough evaluation of AI and its generalizability, a crucial aspect for its application in the clinical setting.
methodsTherefore, we assessed "All Data are Ext" (ADAE), an established open-source ensemble algorithm for detecting melanomas, by comparing its diagnostic accuracy to that of dermatologists on a prospectively collected, external, heterogeneous test set comprising eight distinct hospitals, four different camera setups, rare melanoma subtypes, and special anatomical sites. We advanced the algorithm with real test-time augmentation (R-TTA, i.e., providing real photographs of lesions taken from multiple angles and averaging the predictions), and evaluated its generalization capabilities.
resultsOverall, the AI shows higher balanced accuracy than dermatologists (0.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.779-0.814 vs. 0.781, 95% CI 0.760-0.802; p = 4.0e-145), obtaining a higher sensitivity (0.921, 95% CI 0.900-0.942 vs. 0.734, 95% CI 0.701-0.770; p = 3.3e-165) at the cost of a lower specificity (0.673, 95% CI 0.641-0.702 vs. 0.828, 95% CI 0.804-0.852; p = 3.3e-165).
conclusionAs the algorithm exhibits a significant performance advantage on our heterogeneous dataset exclusively comprising melanoma-suspicious lesions, AI may offer the potential to support dermatologists, particularly in diagnosing challenging cases.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.