Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256516›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2024

Prospective multicenter study using artificial intelligence to improve dermoscopic melanoma diagnosis in patient care.

Lukas Heinlein, Roman C Maron, Achim Hekler, Sarah Haggenmüller, Christoph Wies, Jochen S Utikal, Friedegund Meier, Sarah Hobelsberger, Frank F Gellrich, Mildred Sergon and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Unique Features of Melanoma Risk and Diagnosis in Red-Haired Populations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Robustness of a convolutional neural network trained on dermoscopic images and challenged with close-up images.Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Lukas Heinlein *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-5720-7700
Roman C Maron *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Achim Hekler *Digital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah HaggenmüllerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Christoph WiesDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-298X
Jochen S UtikalDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5316-0241
Friedegund MeierDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-9706
Sarah HobelsbergerDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Frank F GellrichDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Mildred SergonDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Axel HauschildDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital (UKSH), Kiel, Germany.
Lars E FrenchDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4629-1486
Lucie HeinzerlingDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Justin G SchlagerDepartment of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
Kamran GhoreschiDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5526-7517
Max SchlaakDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1663-8098
Franz J HilkeDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gabriela PochDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sören KorsingDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Carola BerkingDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0229-8931
Markus V HepptDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4603-1825
Michael ErdmannDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erlangen, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-European Metropolitan Region Nürnberg, CCC Alliance WERA, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7136-6489
Sebastian HaferkampDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Konstantin DrexlerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3524-7858
Wiebke SondermannDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3684-3523
Matthias GoebelerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7095-9848
Bastian SchillingDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Würzburg and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) WERA, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8859-4103
Eva Krieghoff-HenningDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Titus J BrinkerDigital Biomarkers for Oncology Group, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. titus.brinker@dkfz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3620-5919

Funding

Bundesministerium für Gesundheit (Federal Ministry of Health, Germany) SCP2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly detection of melanoma, a potentially lethal type of skin cancer with high prevalence worldwide, improves patient prognosis. In retrospective studies, artificial intelligence (AI) has proven to be helpful for enhancing melanoma detection. However, there are few prospective studies confirming these promising results. Existing studies are limited by low sample sizes, too homogenous datasets, or lack of inclusion of rare melanoma subtypes, preventing a fair and thorough evaluation of AI and its generalizability, a crucial aspect for its application in the clinical setting.

methodsTherefore, we assessed "All Data are Ext" (ADAE), an established open-source ensemble algorithm for detecting melanomas, by comparing its diagnostic accuracy to that of dermatologists on a prospectively collected, external, heterogeneous test set comprising eight distinct hospitals, four different camera setups, rare melanoma subtypes, and special anatomical sites. We advanced the algorithm with real test-time augmentation (R-TTA, i.e., providing real photographs of lesions taken from multiple angles and averaging the predictions), and evaluated its generalization capabilities.

resultsOverall, the AI shows higher balanced accuracy than dermatologists (0.798, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.779-0.814 vs. 0.781, 95% CI 0.760-0.802; p = 4.0e-145), obtaining a higher sensitivity (0.921, 95% CI 0.900-0.942 vs. 0.734, 95% CI 0.701-0.770; p = 3.3e-165) at the cost of a lower specificity (0.673, 95% CI 0.641-0.702 vs. 0.828, 95% CI 0.804-0.852; p = 3.3e-165).

conclusionAs the algorithm exhibits a significant performance advantage on our heterogeneous dataset exclusively comprising melanoma-suspicious lesions, AI may offer the potential to support dermatologists, particularly in diagnosing challenging cases.

Identifiers

PMID39256516
PMCPMC11387610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.