ArticleScientific reports2024
Surgical Apgar Score and Controlling Nutritional Status Score can be predictors of major postoperative complications after spine surgery.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Malnutrition and Disability: A Retrospective Study on 2258 Adult Patients Undergoing Elective Spine Surgery.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Observational
- ERAS-guided matrix nursing pathway targeting risk factors in spine surgery: development and prospective evaluation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing intraoperative hemodynamics with Surgical Apgar Score (SAS) and preoperative nutritional status with the Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score are said to be useful to predict postoperative complications in many surgical services, but little is reported in the field of spinal surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of SAS and the CONUT score for predicting the risk of major postoperative complications after spinal surgery. We included 659 people who undergone spinal surgery in our institute in eight consecutive years. The occurrence of postoperative major complications was investigated. Background clinical information, surgical information including the SAS and the CONUT score, and the length of postoperative hospital stay were collected. The risk factors of postoperative complications were assessed statistically. Complications occurred in 117 cases (17.8%). The multivariate analysis showed that history of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR] 1.81: P = 0.035), coronary disease (OR 3.33; P = 0.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (OR 1.71; P = 0.025), use of instruments (OR 2.07; P = 0.026), operation time (OR 1.30; P < 0.001), SAS (OR 0.59; P < 0.001), and CONUT (OR 1.34; P < 0.001) were independent risk factors of major complications after spinal surgery. Assessing the intraoperative hemodynamics with SAS and preoperative nutritional status with the CONUT score was useful in predicting major postoperative complications after spinal surgery. People who are detected as high risked people should be managed carefully after spinal surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.