Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256394›Full record

ArticleScientific data2024

PharmaBench: Enhancing ADMET benchmarks with large language models.

Zhangming Niu, Xianglu Xiao, Wenfan Wu, Qiwei Cai, Yinghui Jiang, Wangzhen Jin, Minhao Wang, Guojian Yang, Lingkang Kong, Xurui Jin and 2 more

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Large language models for bioinformatics.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Zhangming Niu *MindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xianglu Xiao *MindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wenfan Wu *MindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qiwei CaiMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yinghui JiangMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Wangzhen JinMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Minhao WangMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guojian YangMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Lingkang KongMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xurui JinMindRank AI, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Guang YangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK. g.yang@imperial.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7344-7733
Hongming ChenDepartment of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology College of Life Sciences and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. chen_hongming@gzlab.ac.cn.

Funding

British Heart Foundation PG/16/78/32402Medical Research Council MC_PC_21013Medical Research Council MR/V023799/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurately predicting ADMET (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity) properties early in drug development is essential for selecting compounds with optimal pharmacokinetics and minimal toxicity. Existing ADMET-related benchmark sets are limited in utility due to their small dataset sizes and the lack of representation of compounds used in drug discovery projects. These shortcomings hinder their application in model building for drug discovery. To address this issue, we propose a multi-agent data mining system based on Large Language Models that effectively identifies experimental conditions within 14,401 bioassays. This approach facilitates merging entries from different sources, culminating in the creation of PharmaBench. Additionally, we have developed a data processing workflow to integrate data from various sources, resulting in 156,618 raw entries. Through this workflow, we constructed PharmaBench, a comprehensive benchmark set for ADMET properties, which comprises eleven ADMET datasets and 52,482 entries. This benchmark set is designed to serve as an open-source dataset for the development of AI models relevant to drug discovery projects.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingDrug DiscoveryData MiningHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmacokineticsPharmaceutical Preparations

Identifiers

PMID39256394
PMCPMC11387650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.