ArticleSleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung2024
Two-stage screening for obstructive sleep apnea in the primary practice setting.
Article in Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Redefining telemedicine in obstructive sleep apnea management through artificial intelligence.Frontiers in sleep · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the effectiveness of a two-stage screening model for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in primary care that combines the STOP-BANG questionnaire (SBQ) with an automated home sleep apnea test (HSAT).
methodsThis cross-sectional study was conducted from August 2018 to August 2022 in four Slovenian primary care practices. It included 153 randomly selected patients aged 18 to 70 years who visited the practice for any reason. Participants completed the SBQ and underwent HSAT with type III polygraphy on the same night. The HSAT recordings were scored automatically and by an experienced, accredited somnologist.
resultsThere was a strong correlation between manual and automated HSAT scorings for the detection of OSA (Pearson's r = 0.93). Cohen's kappa was 0.80 for OSA (respiratory event index (REI) ≥ 5) and 0.77 for OSA severity categorization. The two-stage model demonstrated sensitivity of 64%, a specificity of 97.4%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 96.0%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73.8% and an accuracy of 81.1% for any OSA (REI ≥ 5). For moderate to severe OSA (REI ≥ 15), the model showed 72.7% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity, 85.7% PPV, 92.8% NPV and 91.5% accuracy.
conclusionsThe two-stage model for OSA screening combining the SBQ and automated HSAT was shown to be effective in primary care, especially for moderate and severe OSA. This method provides a practical and efficient approach for the early detection of OSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.