Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256319›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Durability of retrieval-induced forgetting: Effects of different practice schedules.

Elif Sozer, Martin Fagin, Robert Meksin, William Hirst

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elif SozerDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, 80 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10011, USA. sozee287@newschool.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5121-2685
Martin FaginDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, 80 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10011, USA.
Robert MeksinDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, 80 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10011, USA.
William HirstDepartment of Psychology, New School for Social Research, 80 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY, 10011, USA.

Funding

NSF # BCS-1827182NSF # SES-1423751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

If retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) is to play a role in the formation of collective memories, it should be long lasting. Although several studies have found that RIF is short-lived, there is other evidence to suggest that repeated selective practice schedules with a temporal gap between each practice trial may increase the durability of RIF. We tested this possibility in three experiments, focusing on socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting (SSRIF). In two experiments, participants studied scientific or story materials, then listened to someone selectively recall the material repeatedly, either in rapid succession or over an extended time period, and finally recalled the original materials either immediately, after a 1-week delay, or after a 3-week delay. A third experiment examined selective practice in free-flowing conversations. In each instance, RIF was found with repeated selective practice with a temporal gap between trials. The results are discussed in terms of the role RIF might play in the formation of collective memory.

Indexed as

Mental RecallPractice, PsychologicalAdultFemaleHumansMaleTime FactorsYoung AdultCollective memoryDurabilityPractice scheduleRetrieval-induced forgettingSocially shared retrieval-induced forgetting

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.