Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256250›Full record

ReviewJournal of molecular evolution2024

Analysis of Cancer-Resisting Evolutionary Adaptations in Wild Animals and Applications for Human Oncology.

Bokai K Zhang, Leoned Gines

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of molecular evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bokai K ZhangBrigham Young University, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT, 84602, USA. zhangbk@byu.edu.ORCID 0009-0009-9230-7133
Leoned GinesShoreline Community College, 16101 Greenwood Avenue North, Shoreline, WA, 98133-5696, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This literature review is to present a new direction in developing better treatment or preventive measures. The larger the body of an organism, the more numerous the cells, which theoretically lead to a higher risk of cancer. However, observational studies suggest the lack of correlation between body size and cancer risk, which is known as Peto's paradox. The corollary of Peto's paradox is that large organisms must be cancer-resistant. Further investigation of the anti-cancer mechanisms in each species could be potentially rewarding, and how the anti-cancer mechanisms found in wild animals can help influence and develop more effective cancer treatment in humans is the main focus of this literature review. Due to a lack of research and understanding of the exact molecular mechanisms of the researched species, only a few (Elephants and rodents) that have been extensively researched have made substantive contributions to human oncology. A new research direction is to investigate the positively selective genes that are related to cancer resistance and see if homologous genes are presented in humans. Despite the great obstacle of applying anti-cancer mechanisms to the human body from phylogenetically distant species, this research direction of gaining insights through investigating cancer-resisting evolutionary adaptations in wild animals has great potential in human oncology research.

Indexed as

Animals, WildBiological EvolutionNeoplasmsAdaptation, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsHumansCancer ResearchCancer ResistanceMechanismsMolecular BiologyPeto’s Paradox

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.