Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256216›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

Personalised PET imaging in oncology: an umbrella review of meta-analyses to guide the appropriate radiopharmaceutical choice and indication.

Margarita Kirienko, Fabrizia Gelardi, Francesco Fiz, Matteo Bauckneht, Gaia Ninatti, Cristiano Pini, Alberto Briganti, Massimo Falconi, Wim J G Oyen, Winette T A van der Graaf and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [La Radiologia medica · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Predictive Power of Baseline [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  11. Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Using [Cancers · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Challenging the significance of SUV-based parameters in a large-scale retrospective study on lung lesions.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Article
  16. The wings of progress: technological and radiopharmaceutical innovations in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Margarita Kirienko *Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3923-1151
Fabrizia Gelardi *Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7120-333X
Francesco FizDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, E.O. "Ospedali Galliera", Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3932-1330
Matteo BaucknehtDepartment of Health Science (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-9116
Gaia NinattiSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy. g.ninatti@campus.unimib.it.ORCID 0000-0001-8207-1256
Cristiano PiniSchool of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1098-6961
Alberto BrigantiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2178-0494
Massimo FalconiVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9654-7243
Wim J G OyenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8235-7078
Winette T A van der GraafDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7549-3338
Martina SolliniVita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 58, Milan, 20132, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-6492

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeFor several years, oncological positron emission tomography (PET) has developed beyond 2-deoxy-2-[

methodsWe performed a systematic literature search on the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for meta-analyses assessing the accuracy of PET/CT and/or PET/MRI with [

resultsThe literature search yielded 449 scientific articles. After screening titles and abstracts and applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, we selected 173 meta-analyses to assess the strength of evidence. One article was selected from references. Sixty-four meta-analyses were finally considered. The current evidence corroborates the role of [

conclusionThe comprehensive high-level evidence synthesised in the present umbrella review serves as a guiding compass for clinicians and imagers, aiding them in navigating the increasingly intricate seascape of PET examinations.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsRadiopharmaceuticalsHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPrecision MedicineRadiopharmaceuticalsOncologic imagingPET/CTPET/MRPositron emission tomography

Identifiers

PMID39256216
PMCPMC11599298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.