ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Reinforcement learning-driven exploration of peptide space: accelerating generation of drug-like peptides.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contemporary data-driven innovations in peptide-based therapeutic design.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2026Review
- Peptide-based drug design using generative AI.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in bioinformatics: a survey.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Review
- Advances of deep Neural Networks (DNNs) in the development of peptide drugs.Future medicinal chemistry · 2025Review
- Evaluation of Structure Prediction and Molecular Docking Tools for Therapeutic Peptides in Clinical Use and Trials Targeting Coronary Artery Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Trends in the research and development of peptide drug conjugates: artificial intelligence aided design.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Using amino acid residues in peptide generation has solved several key problems, including precise control of amino acid sequence order, customized peptides for property modification, and large-scale peptide synthesis. Proteins contain unknown amino acid residues. Extracting them for the synthesis of drug-like peptides can create novel structures with unique properties, driving drug development. Computer-aided design of novel peptide drug molecules can solve the high-cost and low-efficiency problems in the traditional drug discovery process. Previous studies faced limitations in enhancing the bioactivity and drug-likeness of polypeptide drugs due to less emphasis on the connection relationships in amino acid structures. Thus, we proposed a reinforcement learning-driven generation model based on graph attention mechanisms for peptide generation. By harnessing the advantages of graph attention mechanisms, this model effectively captured the connectivity structures between amino acid residues in peptides. Simultaneously, leveraging reinforcement learning's strength in guiding optimal sequence searches provided a novel approach to peptide design and optimization. This model introduces an actor-critic framework with real-time feedback loops to achieve dynamic balance between attributes, which can customize the generation of multiple peptides for specific targets and enhance the affinity between peptides and targets. Experimental results demonstrate that the generated drug-like peptides meet specified absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity properties and bioactivity with a success rate of over 90$\%$, thereby significantly accelerating the process of drug-like peptide generation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.