Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39256189›Full record

ArticleSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2024

Effective use of skin microbiome signatures for fingerprint identification.

Seda Salman Yılmaz, Mert Ahmet Kuşkucu, Hüseyin Çakan, Gökhan Aygün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Effective use of skin microbiome signatures for fingerprint identification.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seda Salman YılmazCerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical Genetics, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Fatih, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-0544
Mert Ahmet KuşkucuCerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Istanbul University- Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8735-5725
Hüseyin ÇakanDepartment of Biology, Basic and Industrial Microbiology, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Çanakkale, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0574-3578
Gökhan AygünDepartment of Medical Services and Techniques, Medical Imaging Techniques Program, Istanbul University - Cerrahpaşa, Vocational School of Health Services, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-9843

Funding

Research Fund of Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa 28100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advances have increased the importance of the human microbiome, including the skin microbiome. Despite the hand microbiome research, the factors affecting the composition of the hand microbiome and their personal characteristics are incompletely known.

objectivesDespite changing environmental factors and personal variation, we aimed to indicate the interpersonal distinction between skin microbiota using simple and rapid molecular methods.

methodsOver a non-consecutive 10-day period, samples were taken from 10 adult individuals, and ribotyping analysis of the 16S and 23S genes of S. epidermidis was performed on each skin sample. Additionally, EcoRI and HindIII enzyme reactions and variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) reactions of S. epidermidis obtained from DNA samples were performed. The skin microbiomes of individuals were evaluated along with the microbiome profiles left on the surfaces they touched.

resultsIn the environmental samples taken, it has been observed that people preserve their core skin microbiota characters and carry them to their environment. It was determined that the highest similarity rate was 77.14%, and the lowest similarity rate was 31.74%.

conclusionOur study showed that the core skin microbiota retains its characteristics and leaves traces in environments. The fact that the personal microbiome remains unchanged despite environmental differences and has characteristic features has shown that it can be used in forensic sciences to distinguish individuals from each other. These results with simple and rapid methods further increased the importance and significance of the study. The findings indicate that personal skin microbiota can provide a significant contribution to criminal investigations by increasing accuracy and reliability, especially in forensic analyses.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSkinAdultDermatoglyphicsFemaleHumansMaleMinisatellite RepeatsRibotypingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStaphylococcus epidermidisYoung AdultRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sfingerprinthand microbiotaribotypingS. epidermidisskin microbiotaVNTR

Identifiers

PMID39256189
PMCPMC11387109

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.