Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39255988›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2025

Deep Learning-Based ASPECTS Algorithm Enhances Reader Performance and Reduces Interpretation Time.

Angela Ayobi, Adam Davis, Peter D Chang, Daniel S Chow, Kambiz Nael, Maxime Tassy, Sarah Quenet, Sylvain Fogola, Peter Shabe, David Fussell and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Redefining Stroke Care with Artificial Intelligence: Recent Advances.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Angela AyobiFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France angela.ayobi@avicenna.ai.ORCID 0000-0002-4351-6782
Adam DavisAmalgamated Vision (A.D.), Brentwood, Tennessee.
Peter D ChangDepartment of Radiological Sciences (P.D.C., D.S.C., D.F.), University of California Irvine, Orange, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7645-7865
Daniel S ChowDepartment of Radiological Sciences (P.D.C., D.S.C., D.F.), University of California Irvine, Orange, California.ORCID 0000-0002-2359-7394
Kambiz NaelDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (K.N.), Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4194-9488
Maxime TassyFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France.
Sarah QuenetFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France.
Sylvain FogolaFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France.
Peter ShabeAdvance Research Associates (P.S.), Santa Clara, California.
David FussellDepartment of Radiological Sciences (P.D.C., D.S.C., D.F.), University of California Irvine, Orange, California.ORCID 0009-0003-0833-9148
Christophe AvareFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France.
Yasmina ChaibiFrom Avicenna.AI (A.A., M.T., S.Q., S.F., C.A., Y.C.), La Ciotat, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9734-172X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeASPECTS is a long-standing and well-documented selection criterion for acute ischemic stroke treatment; however, the interpretation of ASPECTS is a challenging and time-consuming task for physicians with notable interobserver variabilities. We conducted a multireader, multicase study in which readers assessed ASPECTS without and with the support of a deep learning (DL)-based algorithm to analyze the impact of the software on clinicians' performance and interpretation time. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 200 NCCT scans from 5 clinical sites (27 scanner models, 4 different vendors) were retrospectively collected. The reference standard was established through the consensus of 3 expert neuroradiologists who had access to baseline CTA and CTP data. Subsequently, 8 additional clinicians (4 typical ASPECTS readers and 4 senior neuroradiologists) analyzed the NCCT scans without and with the assistance of CINA-ASPECTS (Avicenna.AI), a DL-based, FDA-cleared, and CE-marked algorithm designed to compute ASPECTS automatically. Differences were evaluated in both performance and interpretation time between the assisted and unassisted assessments.

resultsWith software aid, readers demonstrated increased region-based accuracy from 72.4% to 76.5% (

conclusionsWith the assistance of the algorithm, readers' analyses were not only more accurate but also faster. Additionally, the overall ASPECTS evaluation exhibited greater consistency, fewer variabilities, and higher precision compared with the reference standard. This novel tool has the potential to enhance patient selection for appropriate treatment by enabling physicians to deliver accurate and timely diagnoses of acute ischemic stroke.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningIschemic StrokeRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedHumansObserver VariationReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID39255988
PMCPMC11979804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.